this is why i believe there should be intellectual requirements to vote

Please help me understand that post lol,
Iq dropped at least 20.

right but crit chance is tested every time he hits, so thats where its sampled several hundred times, as the sample size is increased it approaches the % crit chance so regardless if the crit chance is 100, and whether his dmg range is xx-xxxx its over hundreds of samples so any variance between runs is obviously going to be there because its only hundreds of samples, but they are going to be minor.

im assuming there is no down time between skills due to user error.

This post was edited by Ylem122 on Nov 13 2012 09:25am

oh god.

Yes, but in one set of data, the crit chance, that is on sheet 50%, could have hit 80% for RLTW and only 10% crits on ww.
Skewing the data MASSIVELY, also there is RNG in attacks, it can range from a 50-70k WW hit.

right but its over a sample size of several hundred, not just one attack.

So today I made up some figures and published them as gospel, someone is disagreeing so they're wrong.

just a normal post on d3 subforum

Oh god, you're dumb too.
That does not make the data accurate, If we're going by attacks, it would take tens of thousands of attacks to get the average.
They are affected by too much RNG for just a few 100.


It would take 100s of RUNS because of the amount of DATA in each run, averaging those together, giving you reliable data.

This post was edited by HDaqua on Nov 13 2012 09:32am

Yes.

Also bearing in mind that Azmodan's MP10 Health is 138,425,408 health, it would take approximately (7.67aps--> 7.50 ticks per second--> 780 ticks) to bring him down. Every tick will roll randomly based on that critical chance n damage range. @HDaqua, do u understand why i don't do more than once now?

For people who need source, refer to this http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6037344497