Quote (Ylem122 @ Sep 26 2012 10:49pm)
"Innas 2pc set bonus is terrible"
so you disagree with this point you made and restate it as, "innas chest is terrible"?
Omg zombie horse!
You have to look at the context of my statement when I made it. 130 dex is GARBAGE in comparison to some other upgrades that could be made on that character. So in endgame, the 2pc bonus is great (and yes, I do think the chest sucks). But when you have 400+ dex you could be adding in other slots for a marginal cost (because current gear in said slots is bad), then the set bonus is ABSOLUTELY not worth the cost. For instance, even if I could afford 2 pc nats on my monk, I wouldn't get it now because the benefits would be far outweighed by the fact that I'd end up at like 400 res all and 26k health. In which case, Nats set bonus sucks, cuz it's just not worth the cost. However, that's not to say that Nats 2pc is unequivocally bad.
130 dex = good
400 dex = better
130 dex: 30m+
400 dex: 30m+
This is why the set bonus would suck. So having said that, OP just wanted some advice on his gear, I made one comment about spending tons of gold for an upgrade that could better be spent elsewhere, and /thread. lol. Can we stop now?
Quote (Ylem122 @ Sep 26 2012 10:47pm)
sounds right for the most part, just want to add, its added to the base weapon speed, so +.22 would make a mace 1.42 then if ontop of that you have 50% attack speed it would add another .71 aps making your attack speed 2.13.
I didn't actually know %aps on weap was added after decimal increase from EF, in which case, faster weapons would benefit even more than slow weapons, although only slightly.
This post was edited by kylezo on Sep 27 2012 01:12am