Quote (BlizzNorth @ Jul 9 2016 12:34am)
yea it makes sense. they looked at what d2 did and did a bad job of it and took things away/made more casual and simple. made graphic style worse. they didnt try to improve on the formula at all but made the formula worse
maybe they could of looked at d2 and improved the quest and act system and gave more routes and options and more ways to do a single quest. no instead they just made it even more linear straight line. then they took subtle things like cows/ubers and made them into some stupid "end game". so basicly they only removed things and made things more casual and boring. they didnt try to do anything more in depth or interesting with the game.
remember how d1 went from a town and then you go into the cathedral and go deeper. d2 is much different then that style and d3 copied the d2 style exactly without doing anything new other then making it shit and boring. and they put their blizzard south taint on the game with making it feel like wow with its stupid story and interface and non pre rendered graphics. theres not 1 reason d3 should be a 3d game. diablo should be sprite based made from pre rendered models
1) game is more casual so that more people could play and enjoy endgame without having to be unemployed. Even for me most of the times it takes a fucking long time to get geared on d3, but im just unlucky. In d2 it took me half a ladder of playing after work to get a full tal sorc built.
2) i highly disagree that it should be a sprite based game. Welcome to 2016 and not 1999.
3) the d3 endgame is way more fun than d2 endgame. Either you get cancer from pvp community or you do cbaals until the next ladder.
Quote (Drewg @ Jul 9 2016 12:40am)
I could do it, also my sig and profile are better than yours.
No you couldnt.
This post was edited by UkrainianProtein on Jul 8 2016 11:12pm