d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo > Diablo 3 > D3 Discussion >
Poll > What's Ww Damage Like Without Rltw?
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 7 2012 11:31pm
bump
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
Nov 11 2012 08:16am
Try ww with 40% run speed sprint ;)
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 11 2012 11:36pm
Can someone do a test on Mp10 Azmodan?

We need to determine how long it takes to kill Azmodan with ww & rltw, as compared with using only rltw.

From this, we can tell how much damage does WW contribute to overall damage.

Member
Posts: 9,140
Joined: May 29 2005
Gold: 172.01
Nov 11 2012 11:46pm
Quote (joshlolz @ Nov 5 2012 06:37am)
pretty sure it was common knowledge that ww accounts for less than 20% of damage


Pre patch sure.

WW got it's damage buffed by about 50% in 1.04 so I think it's around 20-30% damage now.
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 12 2012 08:25am
Quote (IIFOXII @ 12 Nov 2012 13:46)
Pre patch sure.

WW got it's damage buffed by about 50% in 1.04 so I think it's around 20-30% damage now.


I have just tested the ww damage.

Refer to this thread.

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=65207212&f=68
Member
Posts: 38,802
Joined: Aug 30 2005
Gold: 0.00
Nov 12 2012 11:44am
145% weapon damage
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 14 2012 10:07am
Quote (foxnews @ 13 Nov 2012 01:44)
145% weapon damage


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=65207212&f=68&o=80
Refer to the thread above for a more precise computation of WW damage.

From the poll, only 26.19% has answered correctly.

As requested, I have extended my sample size to total of 5. I understand that this is still a small sample size.
Would definitely extend this sample size in future to give a more reliable results.

My bad for my initial assumption that sample size of 1 is sufficient & reliable. And ty those people who gave me valuable input to improve the reliability of this test.
Feel free to contribute feedback in making this test more reliable.

Just a brief description of my stats again.
I have 2228str and in
In WOTB mode, my mainhand APS is 2.17 (6.67 ticks per second) n OH APS is 2.51(8.67 ticks per second), (source: http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/6037344497)
with 63.5critical chance, 519critical damage.

N for consistency for the test of RLTW only, I ensure that my OH is the last weapon swung before using Sprint. I.e. consistency 8.67 ticks per second.
And for all the runs, no follower was used.

1st Test Run(as per Post#1):
ww & rltw: 1min 45secs
rltw only: 2min 30secs

2nd Test Run:
ww & rltw: 1min 41secs
rltw only: 2min 28secs

3rd Test Run:
ww & rltw: 1min 37secs
rltw only: 2min 27secs

4th Test Run:
ww & rltw: 1min 50secs
rltw only: 2min 23secs

5th Test Run:
ww & rltw: 1min 43secs
rltw only: 2min 28secs

Average time taken for ww & rltw is 103.2seconds
Average time taken for rltw only is 147.2seconds

Computation
X = ww dps, Y = rltw dps, HP = 138,425,408 (azmodan's mp10 health), T1 = time while doing both - 103.2sec, T2 = time while doing just rltw, 147.2sec.
T1(X+Y) = HP --> X+Y = 1,341,331.47, the total Damage Per Second you were doing to kill azmodan in 103.2 seconds.
T2(Y) = HP --> Y = 940,390.00, the dps you were doing to kill azmodan in 147.2 seconds.
X = 1,341,331.47 - Y --> X = 400,941.47, the dps that using ww added.
X/(X+Y) = 400,941.47 / 1,341,331.47 = .2989 or 29.89% of your total dps came from WW

Take Note
This 29.89% is never the 100% accurate answer, n should only be used as an reference. This test should be further extended in future so as to give a more reliable results.

Also bearing in mind that My Mainhand dps is 1160, and Offhand dps is 760, the actual ww damage output will be lowered as compared to Skorn Barb or Dual Wield Barb which has a more similar MH/OH dps.
On top of that, OH is the last weapon swung before using Sprint for my RLTW only test, i.e. consistency 8.67 ticks per second which is higher than my average ticks of 7.67 per second.

Taking into account of these factors, this 29.89% result is an underestimation. My opinion is that the proportion of damage of WW will be more if one were to use Two Handed Weapon, or a More similar Mh/OH dps Dual weapons.

Hope u guys will have a clearer idea on the importance of WW now.
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 22 2012 12:52pm
As per test, answer is closest to 30%

Test
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=65248733&f=142
Member
Posts: 1,639
Joined: Apr 30 2011
Gold: 0.00
Nov 22 2012 01:00pm
that changes depending on your ms right? number of nados?
Member
Posts: 22,230
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 3,700.00
Nov 26 2012 08:05am
Bump
Go Back To D3 Discussion Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll