d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo > Diablo 3 > D3 Discussion > Diablo 3 Should Be Pay To Play > Topic Ofc.
Prev1114115116117118141Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 359
Joined: Dec 26 2010
Gold: 50.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 30 2011 09:38am
LOL langa.
Member
Posts: 8,221
Joined: Jun 4 2007
Gold: 125.00
Jan 30 2011 09:49am
Quote (josh2234 @ Jan 30 2011 01:07am)
Plenty of people have PM'ED me about this. Do you know for sure there will be a SINGLE PLAYER MODE? If so gime LINK, thx :)


here's the link in german ;)

http://www.diablo-3.net/diablo-3-singleplayer-modus-na-wenns-denn-sein-muss/104774

Maybe your browser is able to translate directly.

Singleplayer will definetely be implemented.
Member
Posts: 10,665
Joined: Apr 23 2009
Gold: 129.89
Jan 30 2011 06:27pm
Quote (gateguy @ Jan 30 2011 09:18am)
Wow, this thread is still going strong.

And I still think D3 has a chance to be p2p, simply because Blizzard is a company, and companies exist to make money. The QQers fail to realize that Blizzard will get much more money from P2P even if a portion of the community drops out due to the cost.

How much money they have is irrelevant. How much profit they make is irrelevant. How many people they can hire is irrelevant.

Life in business is about making profit, and nothing more. Gaming companies don't make you happy to make your play experience better; they make you happy so you will keep paying for their game. They don't care about you, as much as they try to seem like they do. They care about your money. And if an opportunity arises for them to make more money, they will logically take that step.

I don't think that it will be P2P myself personally, since the game won't be large/open enough to support that kind of playstyle. But, if it IS P2P, people need to get over themselves and realize that it's not the end of the world.


How much profit they make is irrelevant???????????? Congrats on being the biggest retard in history of anything.

This post was edited by josh2234 on Jan 30 2011 06:28pm
Member
Posts: 20,964
Joined: Mar 16 2009
Gold: 0.29
Warn: 10%
Jan 30 2011 06:32pm
Quote (josh2234 @ Jan 30 2011 06:27pm)
How much profit they make is irrelevant???????????? Congrats on being the biggest retard in history of anything.


Blizzard don't need money, money goes to them instantly cause of the name of the company..
Member
Posts: 5,604
Joined: Feb 8 2006
Gold: 5,999.00
Jan 30 2011 06:46pm
Agree 100%. I would pay $15 a month easily.
Member
Posts: 15,616
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 30 2011 11:42pm
Quote (gateguy @ 30 Jan 2011 08:18)
Wow, this thread is still going strong.

And I still think D3 has a chance to be p2p, simply because Blizzard is a company, and companies exist to make money. The QQers fail to realize that Blizzard will get much more money from P2P even if a portion of the community drops out due to the cost.

How much money they have is irrelevant. How much profit they make is irrelevant. How many people they can hire is irrelevant.

Life in business is about making profit, and nothing more. Gaming companies don't make you happy to make your play experience better; they make you happy so you will keep paying for their game. They don't care about you, as much as they try to seem like they do. They care about your money. And if an opportunity arises for them to make more money, they will logically take that step.

I don't think that it will be P2P myself personally, since the game won't be large/open enough to support that kind of playstyle. But, if it IS P2P, people need to get over themselves and realize that it's not the end of the world.


Others don't seem to understand this.
And you think because some of us don't want to pay per month that we need to get over ourselves?
I find that funny.

It's also funny that you people don't seem to understand that a business isn't 100% about money, if you run a business for that purpose alone, you will fail quickly.

This post was edited by Boogersnot308 on Jan 30 2011 11:43pm
Member
Posts: 4,206
Joined: Mar 7 2006
Gold: 420.00
Jan 30 2011 11:57pm
Quote (josh2234 @ Sep 9 2010 05:01pm)
Ok guys let get this straight.

If you QQ about paying 10$-15$ a month to pay to play for a game, I think your living in like 1995 first of all.

The reason im saying this is, I dont want Diablo 3 to end up like Diablo 2.  I.E, scammmers,bots,cheat,hacks,dupes,spam,non english speakin people who are geting paid 1$ a week in a sweatshop because we want that bad ass item.

Ill go into detail.  When a company stops selling there game in mass amounts, they no longer are making decent $$ to support that game, whatever it may be. So charging a small amount every month gives them ability to support it, and solve the problems such as cheaters, viruses, hacks, gold farmers wtf ever...... AND ADD NEW CONTENT, AND FIX THE OLD OFC :)

I personally also wouldnt want the guild wars approach either,...... coming out with an expansion every time someone cries so they can support there non paying game.

If Diablo 3 is not pay to play, I give it a few months before it turns into the shit hole that d2 did.

Opinions? Flames? Donations :) ?


opinions
sell the game with 3 months of free gameplay, after that 3 months for 15 dollars, a small amount to keep supporting the game. thats 5 dollars a month if its as easy as going to store and charging it up
subscriptions keep alot of the 12 year old out of the game cause there parents shouldnt be out paying a subscription for mature game content

but sadly we all know it will be free to play, but maybe they should make battlenet not free to play on lol problem fixed

This post was edited by clan_aoc on Jan 30 2011 11:57pm
Member
Posts: 4,206
Joined: Mar 7 2006
Gold: 420.00
Jan 31 2011 12:05am
Quote (josh2234 @ Jan 30 2011 07:27pm)
How much profit they make is irrelevant???????????? Congrats on being the biggest retard in history of anything.


it is relevant, each title or game to a company must make so much % of profit. If it dont make as much as projected there stocks will drop and lots of investors will be pissed off cause they didnt make as much money. and every company does alot better with millions of people investing in there company.

but as far as how much money they have and made over the years, and if WoW would completely support the game. is irrelevant
in reality they could just give us diablo 3 for free and not even feel the impact and be still in the billions of dollars but, a business is a business and they only want to grow and keep making more money.
Member
Posts: 10,665
Joined: Apr 23 2009
Gold: 129.89
Jan 31 2011 12:41am
Quote (clan_aoc @ Jan 31 2011 12:05am)
it is relevant, each title or game to a company must make so much % of profit. If it dont make as much as projected there stocks will drop and lots of investors will be pissed off cause they didnt make as much money. and every company does alot better with millions of people investing in there company.

but as far as how much money they have and made over the years, and if WoW would completely support the game. is irrelevant
in reality they could just give us diablo 3 for free and not even feel the impact and be still in the billions of dollars but, a business is a business and they only want to grow and keep making more money.


I was making fun of the other guy for saying " how much profit they make is irrelevant". You fail at reading comprehension also.
Member
Posts: 4,206
Joined: Mar 7 2006
Gold: 420.00
Jan 31 2011 12:46am
Quote (josh2234 @ Jan 31 2011 01:41am)
I was making fun of the other guy for saying " how much profit they make is irrelevant". You fail at reading comprehension also.


thx i dont read every post with full effort there is way to many more of a glance and reply strategy lol
Go Back To D3 Discussion Topic List
Prev1114115116117118141Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll