Quote (bradp89 @ Nov 12 2013 03:22pm)
Oh god, I now remember why I left this sf for so long lol. Competitive isn't GB by the way.
Tell me where I said dogs are a "huge advantage"? I was talking about killstreaks IN GENERAL. Today I called in my dog, after I killed 3 more people and my dog took down 2 people I called in my Maniac. I got 13 kills just by sticking to buildings in the maniac. Take a look back at MW2. I could get a predator, get 2-4 kills with that, call in my Harrier, get 4-6 kills with that, call in my chopper gunner, and get anywhere from 8-20 kills with it. See the chain that killstreaks have started? A simple 5-0 could turn into a 30-0 game against average players. Now take a look back at cod2 with no killstreaks. Every kill you had was completely gun skill. Seeing a common theme here? Killstreaks were put in the game to make cod push towards casual gamers even harder than it was. I'm not saying killstreaks are all bad, because obviously it makes the game a little more exciting. But arguing that killstreaks in general aren't overpowered is plain wrong no matter what way you look at it.
I don't need "to get better". Just because somebody has an opinion about something doesn't mean they're bad. Killstreaks help me get stupidly good scores all the time, even though they help me a lot doesn't mean I think they should be there.
Quote (bradp89 @ Nov 12 2013 03:22pm)
Oh god, I now remember why I left this sf for so long lol. Competitive isn't GB by the way.
Tell me where I said dogs are a "huge advantage"? I was talking about killstreaks IN GENERAL. Today I called in my dog, after I killed 3 more people and my dog took down 2 people I called in my Maniac. I got 13 kills just by sticking to buildings in the maniac. Take a look back at MW2. I could get a predator, get 2-4 kills with that, call in my Harrier, get 4-6 kills with that, call in my chopper gunner, and get anywhere from 8-20 kills with it. See the chain that killstreaks have started? A simple 5-0 could turn into a 30-0 game against average players. Now take a look back at cod2 with no killstreaks. Every kill you had was completely gun skill. Seeing a common theme here? Killstreaks were put in the game to make cod push towards casual gamers even harder than it was. I'm not saying killstreaks are all bad, because obviously it makes the game a little more exciting. But arguing that killstreaks in general aren't overpowered is plain wrong no matter what way you look at it.
I don't need "to get better". Just because somebody has an opinion about something doesn't mean they're bad. Killstreaks help me get stupidly good scores all the time, even though they help me a lot doesn't mean I think they should be there.
ive attended numerous lan events agl,mlg, umg etc etc. you keep assuming things which doesn't help your case, it only makes you look like a douche bag
this game, BY FAR, has the absolute worst killstreaks in terms of how many kills they will generate, you continue to bitch about nothing
given the fast kill times and useless streaks I would say this game requires faster and more precise gun skill then the passed 3 games.
you chaining streaks together once in a while to have a high kill game doesn't make the streaks/chains OP
get better and stop getting killed by dogs and these discussions would be avoided because you wouldn't be bitching
read your recent posts
lots of complaining
discussion over
get better and stop complaining
This post was edited by xSoFTy on Nov 12 2013 02:36pm