I'm better than 80% of people and that is good enough for me. Honestly couldn't care less how good or bad you are. Good to see you care so much about how good I am compared to you though.

Also unlike most people who do well at this game I use a great variety of guns. I use guns that sound like fun in the moment and I cycle through pretty much all guns available.



Notice I said "decent host and connection" implying reasonably equal playing for everyone. Obviously you can reference videos and forums sharing your opinion... Also I played pretty much all COD's but yes blackops1 was my first one I played regularly online. After I broke my blackops1 I played mw2 for about a year and then I switched to BO2.

I love how everyone focuses on upload and download speed when it comes to gaming, but they completely ignore ping and packet loss%. Not to mention proper port configuration...

Please do not try and act oblivious to the circle jerk that goes around on this sub-forum... Often this is the only skewed evidence I see of your so called "majority view". When it comes to conversations on xbox live a much different pattern of preference shows.

This post was edited by Kevorkian on Oct 8 2013 03:20pm

You go to any cod lobby and you hear immature kids who think there the shit and always right. What makes you think a cod sub forum on a gaming website would be any different? Theres people here that know their shit as well as many more who dont. Seems most people here rather talk about what's better or complain about the game than actually play it lmao.

black ops 2 is a great game on LAN - the problem is that you're not playing it on LAN.

it's pretty damn horrible when you're dealing with connection based and it has lag-compensation built in.

i sure do love getting into a lobby where the host lives in the attic of a wendy's and is stealing wifi from the mcdonald's down the street.

Wow wall if text

This, I don't constantly play single player or do split screen zombies with a buddy. It gets really old playing online when your gun is shooting pellets, IW games haven't had as much of a problem with this. So for people who actually play online and not against bots or on lan it is very arguable that bo1+bo2 are garbage. You claiming that hit detection is "fine" shows how little you've played this game online.



It would be interesting to read if it wasn't complete bullshit.

If you have host and your guns are killing in 2-4 bullets this game is pretty sweet, lets just ignore 99% of the time when that doesn't happen and call this the best game in the franchise.

Kevorkian's logic is #1 on jsp.

This post was edited by jadeoshbogosh on Oct 8 2013 06:05pm

3/4 games even when I am not host my bullets kill in about the time I would expect and I live in Michigan... Sorry, but if you are having significant issues with this game than it must be your poor connection or location.

In before people are too stupid to see this...

I like this guy

What's your Gt? just curious

"3/4 games even when I am not host my bullets kill in about the time I would expect and I live in Michigan... Sorry, but if you are having significant issues with this game than it must be your poor connection or location.

In before people are too stupid to see this... - Kevorkian"



or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw9O9RDQyA

Suppose if that video would be bullshit or only exclusive for PS3 for that matter, BO2 doesn't work near as good as MW2 for instance, MW2 played way better than BO2, even with 100-150 ping.
Funny that on PC which has dedi servers, weird frustating shit happens quite often.

Gotta love it that their dedi server game works like crap compared to MW2 which uses P2p system, even without being host in-game.

e: just saw your significant word.
I didn't had significant problems, but it's just frustrating and blatant bullshit sometimes. Don't think that my stats would be any lower or higher if it worked better.

This post was edited by malbaz on Oct 9 2013 06:17am