Quote (ericswanson_19 @ May 3 2013 08:34am)

Awareness in MW2?

MW2 and MW3 are immensely different. It's the people like you who ask for drastically different changes that made the franchise worse. A lot of people would be content if CoD4/MW2 just kept adding map packs. Yes, they add good features with every CoD, but they also always end up adding things that people don't like.

The differences between MW2/3:
-no stopping power
-removed infinite sprint
-added portable radar
-no shotgun secondaries
-penalized people for running around corners
-perk required to throw stuff fast
-made maps smaller with less flanks
-nerfed nades and semtex
-added weapon proficiencies
-added explosive damage delay at beginning of rounds
-can't switch classes between snd rounds without losing streak
-can click through streaks instead of using the exposed one
-added specialist and support
-added incentive to play objective
-added recon and made sitrep hear people with dead silence
-made it incredibly easy to get extended mags
-removed game-ending nuke
-removed painkiller, but added dead man's hand
-removed YY/triangletriangle
-etc

Quote (Kevorkian @ May 3 2013 08:58am)

None of that is worth 60$... In fact I would rather not have most of that and just had them make better graphics.

Also spec ops mw2> mw3 survival mode.

Quote (ericswanson_19 @ May 3 2013 07:15am)

I'm 26, so $60 is less than 3hrs of work. I only play multiplayer anyway. I've only played zombies twice throughout all the CoDs as well.

Quote (ericswanson_19 @ May 3 2013 10:15am)

I'm 26, so $60 is less than 3hrs of work. I only play multiplayer anyway. I've only played zombies twice throughout all the CoDs as well.

Quote (jadeoshbogosh @ May 3 2013 02:18pm)

Yeah I pretty stick to multiplayer for the most part, every once in awhile if I got a buddy over I'll play some split screen zombies. If I can get a whole days worth of actual game play and enjoyment out of a game, it is well worth my $60. It's the main reason I pretty much only buy FPS games and I redbox everything else, I can beat most games in a 8 hour session. No point in paying $60 for that, if I just played campaign I would defiantly not buy these game. I think the only game I've bought in the past 2 years that wasn't a fps was skyrim, which was also well worth my $60. Easy game but I enjoyed the hell out of it .

Quote (Kevorkian @ May 3 2013 11:27am)

I would not spend 1hours of work on a shit game like mw3... Sorry, got two working copies of mw2 right next to me that I got for free. Same game and people are giving it away.



Skyrim is easily the most worthwhile game for its money though. Believe you can get it now for like 30$ too.

Quote (ericswanson_19 @ May 2 2013 02:49pm)

after black ops? you're a fan of BO1? you can't be serious? ..you obviously started on BO1 then. lying about actually playing previous CoDs in their prime is the cool thing to do though i guess. people do it all the time.

Quote (ericswanson_19 @ May 2 2013 02:49pm)

after black ops? you're a fan of BO1? you can't be serious? ..you obviously started on BO1 then. lying about actually playing previous CoDs in their prime is the cool thing to do though i guess. people do it all the time.

Quote (Jupe @ 2 May 2013 11:47)

casual