researched? nah i don't waste my time on such plebeians sorry optic fanboy

bad

The kid makes a post implying that he is good and plays a different game because that is where the "real gamers" are.

That is asking for people to assume he is a douche with good reason.

agreed

ghost is the worst cod so far imo i played to level 11 and i couldnt pick it up again and all the other cod's i played for days on days on days this one just was no fun to me and resulted in a trade in

Ghost is a lot better on ps4 than it is for ps3, runs smoother.

I've heard the same for xone. I'll finally get to try it out on the one later on in the week.

im actually shocked that you guys are enjoying ghost as much as you are. as i said, most of the things that i have heard about it have been negative


i thought that my topic title was something that was universally agreed upon lol but I guess not.


If you are comparing me to the average player then I average out to be about 2x-3x better than your average cod player. If you start comparing me to players that are 5-10x as good as the average player then no im fucking horrible obviously because they're better than me by a factor that is greater than the 2-3x I hold over the average player, which in comparison makes Me vs Someone 5-10x as good as the average player much worse off than an Average player vs Me. There are people out there 5x, 10x, 50x, maybe even 100x as good as the average player but it doesn't change the fact that being 2x-3x over the average can be defined as "good", or you could state that "I perform well". While it's certainly not "elite", "beast", "the best", "godly", it's still good compared to the average.


Compare me to a player that is better than me and yeah, I totally agree that I am bad.

so you are bad at the game?

You're drunk

You called me the b word and kept saying you were going to fuck me like my dad does :/