To be fair, AW did have pay-to-win, so it's more understandable to spend money on those supply drops. As someone who only played 2 days worth and never found an inferno, obsidian steed, or speakeasy, I hated the game. Also, once the BAL was determined to be OP even in its basic state, I refused to use it, because that is boring.

very true. But Aw was very successful in terms of money. So the trend continues with BO3

Obviously. I dont see supply drops going anywhere soon. What a joke dude. It wont be long before they start putting killstreaks in the drops and who knows what else

This post was edited by rc3mil on Jun 1 2016 10:35pm

There is nothing wrong with people paying for aesthetics though. How does it affect you if you die to someone wearing black or someone wearing yellow? Knifed with a combat knife or 'knifed' with a bat? If you're losing to people using the marshall, shadowclaw, then it's a fault of your own, not the game. All the ARs are comparable to the FFAR as well, so the fact that the DLC is usable, doesn't mean it's OP.

I would rather have them get rid of care packages, because getting 4 kills and ending up with a mothership is OP. Getting a supply drop so your character can do a silly dance in the score recap screen doesn't give them any kind of edge.

The Famas is fucking OP as balls. IDK where you get your info or if you even have the gun yourself. Idc what they do. But you must not be a true CoD Fan if you like this fucking game. Since when was WAR ever about dancing? and jumping? in the fucking air 20Ft high?

I don't even think we have this Tech in the real fucking world. This is why Battlefield is ALWAYS Superior to CoD And will remain so till CoD Can get their head out their ass and make a game where its NORMAL.

BF is trash, COD is trash, nothing new. They're both bad games, Cod is just slightly more entertaining.

Battlefield is better than Cod?

Maybe for people who play leisurely and not competitively.

Cod may suck but Battlefield sucks more lol.

BF > cod any day.

Don't see how you can say this because the Newest CoD game has over 1m Dislikes, While the new BF game has over 1M Likes. ROFL

I don't have the famas, nor have I died to it yet AFAIK, but without even having experience with/against it, I know a lot of other guns in the game are quite strong. The famas is still an AR, so more often than not SMGs will win in close quarters. M8/XR2 win at long distance. It seems like a strong mid-range AR, but then your playstyle determines how to interact with it. You decide your routes and how to interact with the enemy. You decide your reaction time. I'm sure the gun is strong, but it's still not a pay-to-win game.

AW had poor hit detection and weapon balance. BO3 has above average hit detection for a Treyarch game and the boost jumping is balanced. Are you getting outplayed by the jumping, because it's usually not the reason I die. I die for all sorts of reasons, but I rarely get upset at the jumping feature.

Comparing BF to CoD is illogical..it's apples to oranges. BF is a marathon simulator. CoD is a twitch shooter. I play CoD to be a tryhard at SnD for the most part. I'm assuming you play BF to ride vehicles and mess around with C4 for the lulz.

Also, CoD has made normal games. People complain about the game being rehashed, then get upset when they add new features.


The dislike ratio was affected by the video going viral, which skewed the natural results. It's not indicative of who is still going to buy the game. A majority of the dislikers are still going to purchase the game, even if they weren't getting CoD4 remastered.

2 million bruh, 2 million