Quote (cloudkicker @ 24 Oct 2016 19:08)
i have already stated that physicians dont need to spend another 4 years each studying nutrition and exercise science because there are other health care providers that fill those roles. MANY physicians understand that diet and exercise play a massive role in health, and will subsequently refer out to experts in those fields. if your physicians aren't aware of these relations maybe they werent held to normal medical training standards. its funny that you mention chiropractors specifically because chiropractic therapy has little to no scientific validity. there is a reason alternative medicine is called what it is, because rigorous attempts to prove efficacy have not been successful. alternative medicine is based on beliefs, not evidence. it would just be called medicine if there were evidence for efficacy. obviously weight loss is possible and you can improve hypertension and biochemistry of the blood, which is why i said a LOT of chronic disease has no cure, not all. you dont need to have a well thought out, organized case against functional medicine because anything that involves chiropractic therapy, homeopathy, and alternative medicine in general is bunk. sure they may be good at suggesting diet plans and maybe they know how to work out. so far you're showing me a bunch of physicians who want to train to be dietitians and personal trainers
Functional medicine doesn't encompass chiropractic, it is just distantly related to it because it is considered alternative medicine. The real strength of functional medicine is its ability to treat various chronic diseases in a systematic way that nobody else really does right now. If you have type II diabetes or thyroid issues, just for example, a functional medicine practitioner can be a lifesaver. I would like to see their results with cancer patients. Right now the top few cancer clinics in NA seem to be in Mexico of all places. Some of them are using what looks like naturopathic treatments, which is why I wonder if functional medicine practitioners are getting similar results (it's one area I don't have a ton of info about yet). The fact remains that functional medicine is producing outstanding health outcomes like nobody else is (within their scope of practice) and this is why I am adamant about their legitimacy as a part of "medicine". This is why I think their referral chain may open very widely in the future.
Quote (dark-soul @ 24 Oct 2016 19:17)
Keep in mind a lot of that weight loss was water weight. Anything works for weight loss if it means you're in a calorie deficit. I'm curious what the functional practitioner did for your concussion. The plan of care for recovery after the initial injury is simply to eliminate strenuous activity and avoid stimulus like video games, homework, etc.
There was some water loss, but the diet itself was low-calorie (without being ridiculously restrictive). It was essentially a dive into ketosis. The bigger point is that it works. So claims that it doesn't work are just plain wrong. I mean, for people who don't comply with very basic instructions, I guess it wouldn't work. You can't always control compliance.
On the concussion: my concussion was considered life-threatening. I did not have a big brain bleed (no surgery required) so that was the good news, but the metabolism of my brain was absolutely rocked. To give you a picture of how bad it was, there's a 4 hour window where I remember nothing. I don't remember being in an ambulance. I had been asking the hospital workers the same questions repeatedly. My short-term memory was affected/screwed until interventions I'll mention below were applied. I was off-balance, I couldn't follow speech beyond a short sentence. My speech was gibberish. I wouldn't read properly I had hallucinations. I had basically every concussion symptom--in a bad way. Stuff lie wanting to vomit in the presence of bright light. Heck, I still have some issues with car headlights at night. Let's skip ahead to the functional medicine practitioner. I was told to take resveratrol, curcumin, and fish oil: a complex to work against inflammation in the brain. I was also told to avoid bright lights--something my attending physician somehow neglected to mention. In fact, at the hospital, the lights were a blazin', as one might expect (just giving me a mask or a towel would've been really helpful). I was told to see an osteopath. I also had a hematoma on my lower back, as well as a hip injury. The hospital did nothing to address them, except to say that the MRI showed no break. Apparently, it was the worst hip/lower back bruising they'd ever seen without any clear fracture. My GP checked me out and just told me to avoid playing basketball for one month.
However, my "alternative" medicine practitioners were very clear that I should not play (basketball) for the next year, in case of a repeat injury that could kill me. A year later, my neurologist concurrent with that advice, not the original advice of my physician. The osteopath instantly cleared me of a really horrible headache with some spinal manipulation. It would be considered an "adjustment". Due to his own concussion history in hockey, he was really well-informed about concussions and he was able to provide me with some neurological testing to help me set some benchmarks -- something my physician had no interest in doing. Moreover, he also recommended some programs I could use to enable my brain to re-pattern some "normal" activity. Another useful intervention from functional medicine came from this guy here (adding video because it's interesting in its own right):
He was able to assess just how bad the
functional damage was to my brain. It was pretty bad, but he also explained how I could get back to normal or just about normal, and his information was almost instantly helpful. Whereas my GP basically told me that my short-term memory was probably f*cked forever, other practitioners were quickly resolving my problems. My attending physician and GP both missed an injury to my occipital lobe, something that was discovered and quickly addressed by an "alternative" medicine practitioner. The fix was somewhat simple, and it took a couple of weeks. Technically not all the damage was resolved within a couple of weeks, but the
functional component (i.e., vision) was fixed that way.
Getting back to my osteopath and chiropractor: they were able to help me with stiffness and pain in the spine and neck. Later, after I got back to playing basketball--and after a lot of driving on a vacation--I managed to slip a disc. Whereas my physician figured I should wait it out and queue for surgery in case it was a busted bursa or something worse (interestingly enough eh was not curious about the type of pain I was experiencing, which is a key marker for the type of injury sustained), my chiropractor put it back in place, thereby enabling me to stop wall-crawling around the house. I learned how to un-stick my IT band (which unfortunately can't be stretched out). My osteo and chiro have been able to put my thumb back in place, fix a previously recurring rib injury, address a long time foot problem related to bone and myofascia (albeit painfully, yet they fixed it). And so on. The point is that chiropractors and osteopaths are practicing medicine. In many cases, given my injury-prone, risk-taking nature, they were able to quickly fix issues that had previously plagued me and which physicians had always told me were completely unresolvable, except for the aid of sweet Father Time and some painkillers.
Have I just been unlucky with the physicians I've seen over the years? Have I been lucky with the alternative medicine practitioners I have gotten help from? There are physicians who feel helpless to address problems likes the ones I have faced, so they're constantly caught up in a big referral engine. Sometimes you get a useful answer and you get the right treatment. Sometimes you don't. And when you don't, as I have experienced many times, real medical problems can be fixed reverses, whatever, by so-called alternative medicine practitioners. Some are quacks, I'll grant that. But I haven't been treated by one yet. I have only seen success so far.
I don't like dismissive claims about functional medicine or chiropractors in general just because it is quite clear to me--beliefs aside--that real medicine is being done by them with quantifiable and qualitative results. The business and the arrogance of "medicine" is a shame. Why can't people who help people just work together and solve more medical problems? Despite my experiences (I have more to describe if need be) with failures of "medicine", I am not saying that MDs are quacks. I understand math and science. For the record, during my undergraduate studies, I was asked to teach a course to medical students at Queen's University. I have won two international math competitions. I have taught logic. I have studied theoretical physics, right down to the painful nuances of topology. I contributed a definition of abstract objects (like numbers) that has been used by physicists. Basically, I was a math prodigy from early childhood. So one would think I'd turn out to be an arrogant prick who thinks alternative medicine is all quackery, right? No. Instead, I got curious about it, asked some questions, learned some stuff, and came to see that there are plenty of working forms of alternative medicine.
I'm happy to accept that all alternative medicine practitioners have limitations in their understanding and scope of practice, but it's not much different than the limitations and scope of practice of MDs, whether they are specialists or not. This is why the case for functional medicine is strong. They can be a really helpful part of a referral engine. There are MDs who already get that. But there are a lot of MDs who don't, and that's what I find painful. Just get curious. An MD doesn't need to convert to functional medicine (but some do and I think that's great) or learn everything about it, but just learning
enough about how it affects real people should be enough to get the ball rolling. My own GP happens to be a friend, and he has come around to a point where he is getting really curious about my new business (which includes some functional medicine--no, I'm not the fm practitioner), even offering me an office space in his own practice (we're creating our own space elsewhere). I have been critical of him above not to suggest that he is a bad doctor, but rather to suggest that, in my experience, he's a pretty typical physician. There are just a lot of things he doesn't know. He's really good at what he does know. He is open about what he doesn't know and my is receptive to feedback and criticism because he realizes it can make him better at what he does.
@ cloudkicker: you misread me again. It's not that functional medicine is just about diet and personal training. Most only make vague recommendations for exercise, or they just put an expert on staff for that stuff. They refer out diet to some extent, too. It depends on the practice. Diet is definitely under the umbrella, but it's nothing like the stuff dieticians are into. It's
functional medicine, and while the scope of practice can be wide depending on available exercise, chronic disease is probably the major focus. I'm pretty sure that functional medicine practitioners usually avoid dieticians, at least in Canada. Dieticians here are often the closest thing we have to quacks. Whereas functional medicine practitioners understand cell biology, the bodies systems, along with the causes and essentially the treatment of chronic illness. Methylation and mitochrondrial health are sometimes emphasized. The approach is often to fix the body at the cellular level first, and thereby affect the organ, system, or body. The approach is generally systematic, one way or the other.