TheOaks arms look pretty more cut imo
no offense Balla

This post was edited by Hellspray on Mar 20 2011 01:00pm

your arms are a fat 17", his are a muscular 17". your outrageous confidence is just skewing what you see

well duh he's a lower bf %



his are more cut
but mine are far from fatceps lmao, you can actually see some shape and whatnot to the arm
you being a complete dumbass is skewing what you see



that was a week or 2 ago

since when is that a fatcep?

i can post a pic of fatceps, just google it lol

they're not fatceps, you have legit 16-16.5" arms if you cut. i'm saying when you put an inch on your biceps in 3 weeks, most of that is gonna be fat. don't even try to say otherwise

@bold umadbro?

This post was edited by SeXyJeBuS on Mar 20 2011 04:03pm

Well see you're making sense now.
I don't have fatceps now clearly (I thought you were trying to say i do now)
but obviously fat covers everyones..i was honestly hoping if i cut down to about 10% ill be at 16.5" cut..might be less who knows
but same for oak..when he gets in contest shape(under 10%) his will shrink alot too

and nah i wasn't mad, just making a point it would be ignorant to say i had fatceps now lol

jesus fuck less arm pics god dammit... It's like all you care about! Get us leg pictures, a most muscular, something other than the same arm over and over again.

it's just the easiest to take a pic of

no one to take a most muscular pic
no one to take a leg pic..my legs are 27.75" atm gettin kinda big i guess so i'd def post a pic if i could

when i actually cut ill take time to get someone to take full body pics of me though lol..until then it's w/e

also though that arm pic is a few weeks old, was posting it to prove a point..and the pic of the measurement was because people doubted it last time i tried that

We don't care about the measurement. We've just seen the arm often enough as it is. And Oak's arm does look much bigger.

This post was edited by CMBurns on Mar 20 2011 06:26pm

True but it's unrealistic to ask people to take pics here and there lol..will save that for when i cut and when i cycle

and lol'd
how could it look "much" bigger if it's the same measurement, and mine's even proven from a tape measure..does height really make THAT much of a difference in the appearance of things like this? and how if his has zero peak and mine does..maybe im just not seeing it as my opinion is biased as fuck since i think im gods gift to earth though

Even if it's the same measurement, it looks alot fuller and larger.