d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Health & Fitness > Always Down To Help Some Brahs Out > Training, Supplementation, Nutrition Adv
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 871Replies: 68Track Topic
Member
Posts: 4,628
Joined: Oct 2 2010
Gold: 11.58
#51
May 16 2016 06:26pm
Quote (tommyd323 @ May 16 2016 02:22pm)
Are you arguing that it's not better to do lower reps on a cut or are you just giving different reason for it?


im just stating that theres no such thing as hyperplasia
Member
Posts: 37,239
Joined: Oct 13 2008
Gold: 3,375.01
#52
May 16 2016 07:05pm
OP only has a decent upper body because he is juiced to the gills.

Member
Posts: 35,756
Joined: Aug 23 2009
Gold: 56.00
#53
May 16 2016 07:34pm
Quote (cloudkicker @ May 16 2016 05:26pm)
im just stating that theres no such thing as hyperplasia



Wait so what I said was true, just I worded it wrong? It's a different reason that you get stronger on a cut, that isn't because of strength cell reproduction/growth?
Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Apr 11 2016
Gold: 0.07
#54
May 16 2016 07:35pm
Quote (Aube @ May 17 2016 04:22am)
How do you setup you linear periodization with higher than once a week frequency? Do you use any kind of daily undulation?


Y u hef 2 B made, Gabrielle
Member
Posts: 4,628
Joined: Oct 2 2010
Gold: 11.58
#55
May 16 2016 08:02pm
Quote (RyanDyerProtein @ May 16 2016 09:35pm)
Y u hef 2 B made, Gabrielle


LOL you watch tyler1?
Member
Posts: 4,628
Joined: Oct 2 2010
Gold: 11.58
#56
May 16 2016 08:04pm
Quote (turtol @ May 16 2016 09:34pm)
Wait so what I said was true, just I worded it wrong? It's a different reason that you get stronger on a cut, that isn't because of strength cell reproduction/growth?


thats the common dogma but im not sure its scientifically validated
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: May 11 2016
Gold: 10.00
#57
May 16 2016 08:08pm
Quote (Aube @ May 16 2016 03:22pm)
How do you setup you linear periodization with higher than once a week frequency? Do you use any kind of daily undulation?


lmao no idea.. sounds uesless
Member
Posts: 13,624
Joined: Apr 20 2010
Gold: 2,133.00
#58
May 16 2016 09:08pm
Quote (cloudkicker @ May 16 2016 09:04pm)
thats the common dogma but im not sure its scientifically validated


It makes sense to me frorm the point of less tissue getting broken down by those lower reps, so easier to replenish as compared to high reps.
Member
Posts: 4,628
Joined: Oct 2 2010
Gold: 11.58
#59
May 16 2016 10:56pm
Quote (tommyd323 @ May 16 2016 11:08pm)
It makes sense to me frorm the point of less tissue getting broken down by those lower reps, so easier to replenish as compared to high reps.


How do we know it has to do with reps and not total working volume? What if higher resistances are required to induce structural protein damage relative to moderate loads?
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: May 11 2016
Gold: 10.00
#60
May 17 2016 05:21am
Quote (cloudkicker @ May <a href="tel:16 2016 11">16 2016 11</a>:56pm)
How do we know it has to do with reps and not total working volume? What if higher resistances are required to induce structural protein damage relative to moderate loads?



Lol u guys are complicating it for no reason. Real fuckin basic actually..
Go Back To Health & Fitness Topic List
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact