Quote (Balla @ Aug 2 2014 11:36pm)
Full text:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/1rw3xcThey're essentially saying glucose deprivation falls under metabolic stress-mediated hypertrophy, whichs falls within the paradigm of lactic acid and other metabolites that challenge cellular integrity. They're saying muscular contraction at a high intensity causes arterial and venous compression (during the actual lift), that occludes the muscle from receiving nutrient rich blood flow, even in such a transient manner.
I see where they're going with this and it's actually quite enthralling. They're looking for the specific mediators of anabolic pathway signaling due to exercise.. such as the hypothesized phospolipase D expression cleaving membrane lipids to phosphatidic acid, activating mTOR. Thus, they show here that the brief glucose deprivation stimatules the mTOR pathway as well. However;
they gathered cells in a glucose-free medium at 30, 60, 120, or 180 min. I don't see anywhere near 30 mins of glucose deprivation occuring during training. During the actual contraction process, a lift MAY take 1 min, and that's on the far end. That will occur many times over during a workout, and assuming a high volume, hypertrophy-oriented routine, maybe 12 mins of glucose occlusion (assuming 45 secs/set * 16 sets). Now, 12 mins, intermittently spread out every 1-2 mins is not at all the same as 12 mins or especially 30 mins straight.
Irrespective of the times they used, and applicability to real life, I would surmise that the brief periods of glucose deprivation/nutrient rich blood flow occlusion may absolutely contribute to anabolic signaling under the paradigm of metabolic stress. Even though brief, the brief period is during the time glucose is gravely needed aka active contraction, so the effect should be augmented. This study shows that the brief deprived periods cause significant mTOR pathway during the recovery/reavailability of glucose.
They also show glucose deprivation alone robustly induces AMPK. This gives another signaling mechanism that contributes to its activation, apart from general ATP & glycogen depletion, ROS induction, and Ca2+ signaling. Further, they showed the AMPK expression didn't induce MAFbx (a ubiquitin ligase, causes muscle atrophy by degrading them via the proteasome), corroborating studies finding AMPK-alpha 2 is induced via exercise, which doesn't inhibit anabolic pathways and contribute greatly to catabolism.
Last, aiming to elucidate mechanisms by which it contributes to mTOR upregulation, they found NOS is activated, upregulating NO production, contributing greatly to the mTOR activation. It also seems the AMPK that's strongly upregulated by the glucose depri mediates the NOS induction, aiming to increase glucose uptake.