d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Health & Fitness > Official Hnf Articles Thread > Revived
Prev1383940414275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 9 2014 10:51pm
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=256862177853603&id=175556779317477

Article on the transient hormonal increases of test, GH, igf1 following exercise, and why they don't matter.
A bit scattered though.
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jun 10 2014 02:56am
Quote (Balla @ Jun 10 2014 06:51am)
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=256862177853603&id=175556779317477

Article on the transient hormonal increases of test, GH, igf1 following exercise, and why they don't matter.
A bit scattered though.


gj m9
Member
Posts: 34,022
Joined: Jan 5 2007
Gold: 461.04
Warn: 70%
Jun 10 2014 02:59am
Quote (Balla @ 10 Jun 2014 06:51)
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=256862177853603&id=175556779317477

Article on the transient hormonal increases of test, GH, igf1 following exercise, and why they don't matter.
A bit scattered though.


A little stilted, and with a few grammatical mistakes, but great nonetheless. I'll link it later.

Quote (JiMbOAbSoLuT @ 9 Jun 2014 18:55)
What about the studies in examine.com that link green tea catechins consumption with lower fat mass, higher fat oxidation, and better insuline sensitivity?



Waiting still for this. Yih guys convene green tea catechins don't do shit, but the studies cited at examine.com say otherwise.
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 10 2014 08:34am
Quote (Lightman @ Jun 10 2014 04:56am)
gj m9


Ty m9

Quote (JiMbOAbSoLuT @ Jun 10 2014 04:59am)
A little stilted, and with a few grammatical mistakes, but great nonetheless. I'll link it later.




Waiting still for this. Yih guys convene green tea catechins don't do shit, but the studies cited at examine.com say otherwise.


Yes very scattered lol. And you're probably right tbh.

The examine link even says it's dependent on being caffeine naive, as that's where the real fat burning benefit could come from. Second, the studies say a small, but unreliable increase in metabolism or fat oxidation (although many more oppose that). Last, the dose needed to even achieve these dubious, unreliable shifts are 10+ cups of green tea, or using pure extracts. I'd personally never consume that much green tea for fear of hepatotoxicity.

This post was edited by Balla on Jun 10 2014 08:35am
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 12 2014 09:19am
"Oxytocin is an age-specific circulating hormone that is necessary for muscle maintenance and regeneration"

http://ge.tt/1lxlmzj1/v/0

Well that's unexpected lol.
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 13 2014 09:58pm
"The role of the central ghrelin system in reward from food and chemical drugs"

https://www.sendspace.com/file/roz7fg

Dl link to full paper.

Member
Posts: 32,685
Joined: Feb 11 2009
Gold: 603.00
Jun 21 2014 01:56am
Any articles on overtraining?
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 22 2014 10:53am
Sheet, finally almost done with my literature review for my project (have to do for a program I'm in). Already upward of 40 citations, even including several "summaries" of the topics, and not looking for purely individual studies themselves.. and trying to keep it short. Fuark. This is awful lol.. taking fucking forever, worked on it yesterday for 10-12 hours (mostly just reading through full study after study though).
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 26 2014 09:40am
Member
Posts: 30,461
Joined: Nov 12 2007
Gold: 748.53
Jun 26 2014 11:45am
Someone asked me a question about how much genetics play a role in being fat, so I thought I'd post my response to him here:

Not much.

Not considering clinically diagnosed hypo- or hyper- thyroidism, the difference in metabolic rate, between two similar individuals, is around 500-600 cals, at the very most. On average, probably around 100-300 range. Thus, in most cases, no, genetics do not play a significant role at all in losing fat.. it's still governed by thermodynamics, as usual. Deleterious sequelae as a result of chronic obesity, and ergo myriad metabolic derangements, can however override these rules, to an extent. For instance, chronic obesity will lead to leptin resistance, thus the main long-term signal for satiety, plus a main hormone/adipokine in increasing/regulating metabolic rate (via catechomaines & thyroid hormones), is now unable to exert its usual effect. Another example, which also feeds into the aforementioned pathway, includes a robust cortisol response. Once the leptin resistance, and other similar perturbations occur, and your satiety signals are attenuated, you will most likely continue to overeat. Cortisol is typically lipolytic, however, in the presence of insulin, especially mass fluxes you would expect in the chronic obese patient (overeating/high CHO foods, insulin resistance), it will augment the fat storage/lipogenesis capabilities.

Now, there are instances of actual genetic mutations, exorbitantly increasing incidence/risk/severity of obesity. Important here are SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), which are the exact, ubiquitous mutations that are pertinent here (amongst a few other, rarer forms). There are a few particularly common mutations that appear to cause obesity, either directly or indirectly (apart from hypo-thyroidism), such as mutations in the melanocortin 4 receptor, prohormone convertase, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), etcetera. These, and the few other common mutations, are all typically involved in either signaling for satiety, or in producing metabolic hormones themselves (so, leptin/melanocortin pathways). Or with BDNF - reward behavior with eating.
The melanocortin 4 receptor polymorphisms seem to account for roughly 6% of all cases of obesity.. but again, that's already a small amount of the total population (IIRC I read it was a bit less than 2% or something, but I may be off), making it incredibly uncommon.. but on the flip-side, not terribly uncommon in those actually obese, considering. I don't know about the rest. I wouldn't really consider these too pertinent for typical conversation dealing with fat loss, though. These are clearly rare.. my example is, I believe, by far the most abundant.

So, tl;dr - most likely not worth considering the genetic contribution to fat loss/obesity.
Go Back To Health & Fitness Topic List
Prev1383940414275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll