Quote (HyphyIll @ Nov 21 2014 02:23pm)

Take a look at some of Rich Piana's videos on YT

Quote (Balla @ Nov 21 2014 09:04pm)

I disagree
while it's good to get a first hand view of someone so open, he seems to openly disagree with conventional thoughts of steroids.. that's fine, if what he said were true lol. He literally has 0 knowledge of the human body, science, etc.

Quote (Balla @ Nov 21 2014 11:04pm)

I disagree
while it's good to get a first hand view of someone so open, he seems to openly disagree with conventional thoughts of steroids.. that's fine, if what he said were true lol. He literally has 0 knowledge of the human body, science, etc.

Quote (MGS4BestGameEverMade @ Nov 20 2014 08:45pm)

Time for one of those threads again, this time phrased a bit differently (at least I've never read a similar discussion before)

For our social experiment we'll have two identical twins, or clones (100% copy). Both start training at a normal age, say 15. they train exactly the same way and eat exactly the same food so they are also irrelevant factors in this case. There's only one thing that separates these two clones:



Twin A : is completely natty throughout his entire career (age 15 to say.. 35)


Twin B decides to do a couple of cycles. Let's say he took his first cycle age 18, second at age 20, third at age 21 and fourth at age 22.

Obviously Twin B will look *vastly* superior to Twin A during each of those 6-12 week periods he consumed those steroids but how would Twin A compare to Twin B at age 24? Remember Twin B hasn't done a cycle since for two years. How would Twin A compare to Twin B during the remaining 40-45 weeks of the year that Twin B wasn't on the juice (age 18, 20, 21 and 22)

and you can ask the same about age 25, age 30, 32, 33, 35 etc... neither of them ever stop lifting or dietting, the only difference is Twin B taking the cycles at given times throughout his lifting career.

Discuss.

Quote (BodyBuild @ Nov 21 2014 08:03pm)

Maybe if he kept doing stupid cycles.  OP, if you're planning to get on, and do multiple cycles, you might as well blast and cruise.  Would put a lot less stress on your body.

Quote (Balla @ Nov 21 2014 08:36pm)

Yeah, not really
continually staying on? Even using the low doses, that's bad. That's literally shutting down an entire endocrine system lol. Do you realize at all possible far reaching ramifications beyond that of the gonads themselves? Learn some endocrinology tbh.

Quote (Balla @ Nov 21 2014 07:36pm)

Yeah, not really
continually staying on? Even using the low doses, that's bad. That's literally shutting down an entire endocrine system lol. Do you realize at all possible far reaching ramifications beyond that of the gonads themselves? Learn some endocrinology tbh.

Quote (ChowYunFat @ Nov 20 2014 05:54pm)

He's (obviously) read a lot on the issue, but I fear he suffers from confirmation bias.  That, or he unintentionally glosses over the risks involved when the subject comes up.