Quote (Lightman @ Mar 28 2014 06:28pm)
ehh fb page. got a lady friend coming over so i cant help u right now. idr if ethan has permissions to look through the page topics list.
its funny, i just got done reading literally every post on the page in prep for my nutrition and exercise paper.
except i didn't try to use your hypothesis...
either way...
"Let's get the fluff outta the way first.
Eating clean, timing meals, preworkout/postworkout nutrient intakes, stopping to eat past a certain point or cancelling certain food groups to promote fat loss are all in all debunked.
Fat loss is a mathematical phenomenon, relying on the intake deficit rather than the source(s) of the intake itself.
http://user210805.websitewizard.com/files/unprotected/AARR-Jan-2008.pdf<-- AA's research in 2008 explaining the deficit as the prime and sole contributor to fat loss.
http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/2/196.full.pdf+html<--J. Connolly and T. Romano's conclusive research on the potential of caloric restriction under the premise of a deficit as prime contributor to weight regulation.
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/92/3/865.long<--Alfonso and K. Martin's take on fat loss and body composition in presence vs absence of routine exercise.
All reach the same foundational basis- Negative net thermal balance equals fat loss."
-Lightman