What's wrong with 16s?

def bigger than 16", I'd say his estimate on 17-17.5 is pretty accurate

haha.. yeah i'm gaining some fat.. not a whole lot though.. doing cardio like 3-4 days a week.. weight gain is going decently slow
but the reason there's not much definition in this pic is because the lighting sucks.. it's like glaring on it.. if i took a pic with selective lighting i'd look ripped in that pose tbh

also i do need to tone starting in either march or april though.. not sure yet.. hopefully FINALLY being able to bulk for a few months without having to stop for awhile will yield some serious gains

my biceps were 15" during my first year of training...

This post was edited by MGS4BestGameEverMade on Dec 17 2011 05:08am

its not b/c the lighting, you must have like thick skin or something because even at ~180lbs u didnt really have much definition
that and the fact u said u did have a pump.... although makes u thicker, often reduces the definition.




they look ~15" now....

isnt it sorta hard to tell through a picture since everyone has different proportions?

Of course pictures make it harder to see but if you have very visable cuts then you will see it with a camera np.

Pictures don't do anyone justice on these forums, but since we are all at a disadvantage, it is fair.

People like Boxa and Burns look huge in pictures but doesn't do nearly the justice seeing those two big mofos in real life.

All you do is post arm pics...

O_o

Do you curl erryday?

is this srs?
you haven't payed one bit of attention then

Wat