Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Sep 17 2018 06:31pm)
Let me help you really quickly.. TDEE is not universal, the required deficit is.
How so? I’ll summarize the article above that you didn’t read.
1 lb of fat is roughly 3500 calories. In order to burn 1 lb of fat per WEEK “7 days”, you need to eat 500 cals less “500x7=3500 calories, or 1 lb of fat”.
The first few weeks of weight loss, you’re also losing a large amount of water weight through insensible loss. Any deficit will end up in successful weight loss, but in order to optimize loss you need to understand physically how it works.
I fail to see where OP asked to lose 1lb of fat per week, but that's besides the point.. I never said that a 500kcal deficit's
never the answer.
Read this sentence 3 more times and digest is before you reply again.
"
Anyone who tells you that to lose weight/cut you need to be on a 500+ deficit hasn't got a clue of what he's talking about."
My argument is that: You don't know his/her TDEE. You don't know his/her bodyweight. You don't even know his/her gender. He/she could be a 55kg heavy woman with 16% bodyfat wanting to cut. Suggesting "500kcal deficit for weight-loss" as an universal rule is silly. And suggesting that he/she needs to cut calories further when he/she's already dropped 9lbs in 3 weeks is silly.
Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Sep 17 2018 06:44pm)
You’re right, half a pound a week is optimal. I concede, listen to this guy. You’ll be 20 lbs down by the next decade.
Not at all what I said. I'm arguing that suggesting someone who's losing 2lbs a week to double their cut because you say so is silly.
This post was edited by Galera88 on Sep 17 2018 12:47pm