You must have a terrible life. You're always so angry. There's more to nutrition than 1 extreme or the other. You seem to only focus on both.
Please, go ahead and argue Crossfit. I would love to see your media fueled hatred bullshit

This post was edited by BoneYard on Jul 25 2014 09:36pm

I have a great life, that's why I allow myself full self expression. Nice ad hominem try.

nothing to argue about the worst type of "training" ever invented. Most momentum-abusive, delusional, injury filled exercises in the world were invented under the guise of crossfit.

builds shittier cardio than a simple jog. builds no strength at all.
literally the "special ed" section of the world of lifting. Go on to creating more ridiculous routines and calling them girls' names to give yourself the illusion working out

Raving.

i try and limit my daughters sugar

Lmao

@OP - I agree that the science doesn't really support any negative ramifications; however, I wouldn't have my child eating mounds of sugar. Science continues to prove that a well balanced diet always prevails.

Well-balanced meaning my kids will be paleo bros... srs... not srs.

This post was edited by PureOwnage2 on Jul 26 2014 07:43am

The view he was portraying was one of a balanced diet where sugar isn't eaten in an exorbitant excess.

Then there's your post which served to back up an "extreme" view from Gannon that NO ONE SHOULD EAT ANY PROCESSED SUGAR EVER OMG IT WILL KILL US ALL.

And you're the one claiming there's more than one extreme or the other? Then you use a ridiculous logical fallacy to redirect?

Where in my post did i say "NO ONE SHOULD EAT ANY PROCESSED SUGAR EVER OMG IT WILL KILL US ALL?" ?

And when did i claim anything? I wrote some of the negatives of sugar, which was the question.

This post was edited by BoneYard on Jul 26 2014 04:59pm

you must have a terrible life because you dont hang out with alice molly or lucy. or snort coke
brb raving
lol

Lawl.
I like you