d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Health & Fitness > The Importance Of Eccentric Contraction
Prev1234511Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 12,196
Joined: Dec 13 2009
Gold: 1,310.23
Jan 15 2011 06:34pm
Quote (Synonym @ Jan 14 2011 11:33am)
Going down is the eccentric contraction, which should take 4 seconds. Going up with a spotter while performing an eccentric exercise should take 2 seconds just to put the bar up again, without you even helping to raise it (0% involvement while the concentric movement is being made via outside party / helpers).

Your entire involvement is the eccentric movement, a.k.a Going down at BB Flat. Nothing else.


ohhh i see, thats even more interesting, im not working on both eccentric/concentric movement.

but actually jst focusing on the eccentric contraction (negatives) and "restarting" at the top if the movement.

i didnt see anywhere a recommended amount of reps/sets , suggestions?"

and also i believe this to be the reason for the majority of my muscle gains. I've never been a "fast" lifter and have always lifted slowly and with stron mind/muscle connection. :D

good info tho :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 16 2011 02:32am
Amount of repetition has to do with your muscle gain goal, be it Strength, Endurance or Hypertrophy.
Upon applying 130% RM you would be working on Strength mainly, therefore the repetitions should not exceed 5. As for Endurance and/or Hypertrophy (10 / 15+) you would have to perform Trial & Error. Saying for example to apply 80% RM at Hypertrophy is the general recommendation but I've found that simple experimentation leads to different results. However the 130% RM is pretty fixed at most cases.

Lifting slowly > Lifting more, that is unimaginatively so powerful in its truth.
Member
Posts: 3,278
Joined: Mar 17 2004
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 60%
Jan 16 2011 04:26am
tl;dr

cliffs:

do full ROM
Member
Posts: 2,069
Joined: Dec 30 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 16 2011 07:45am
Quote (Synonym @ Jan 14 2011 01:24am)
Table of Contents
Contraction Types & Definition
What is Contraction?
Speed-Tension Curve
Eccentric Contraction- Benefits
Why So Slow?


Contraction Types & Definition

Eccentric- The part of the exercise in which the outside weight or resistance factor (Body weight in relative exercises) is overpowering the muscle newton strength.
The muscle lengthens as it contracts by having the weight drop the ligament or body part in a controlled timing period.

Concentric- The part of the exercise in which the muscle newton strength is overpowering the outside weight or resistance factor.
The muscle shortens as it contracts while lifting the weight.

Isometric- The part of the exercise in which both the muscle newton strength and the resistance factor are equal.
The muscle neither shortens nor lengthens, rather contracts in a static manner. This is why these type of exercises may be referred to as "Static exercises".

What is Contraction?

Every muscle fiber (Myofibril) hones a great deal of fiber filaments (Myofilaments), which are divided into two groups:
  • Actin Filaments- These are also termed "The Thin Filaments". These filaments are coiled with nebulin filaments.
  • Myosin Filaments- These are also termed "The Thick Filaments". These filaments are coiled with titin filaments.

The two groups converge into a complex composition, which is also known as "Actomyosin". A perfect view of that phenomenon can be seen here (0:54-1:11):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CepeYFvqmk4


Speed-Tension Curve

The elements which affect the muscle's ability to produce strength state:
  • Maximal power can be achieved via Eccentric contraction.
  • One cannot develop maximal power by performing fast contractions
  • The abilities to develop maximal power and maximal speed in the same action are different abilities

Remember:
Concentric-wise, as long as your speed is greater, the muscle will develop less power.
Eccentric-wise, as long as your speed is greater, the muscle will develop more power.

These two statements are true, to an extent. Why? Because we need to remember the 2nd element, which tells us that fast contractions simply don't work efficiently. Having your concentric contraction last more than 10 seconds would be too slow, and having your eccentric contraction last less than 1 second would be too fast.

Eccentric Contraction- Benefits

Applying Motor Units
A motor unit is the smallest operable functional unit for contracting muscles. Its structure is formed of a motoric neuron and all the muscle fibers it is attached to.
Not all motor units are the same. Motor units differentiate in number of muscle fibers. Knowing that, we must remember the following rule: "All or nothing". A motor unit will either operate at 100% muscle fiber contraction, or not at all. A motor unit consisting of 10 muscle fibers will apply 10 muscle fibers when operating, or not at all.
Therefore, the smaller the motor unit, the less power it produces, the more delicate the action is. One could see the difference when looking at an eye and a leg. The leg has motor units that measure in thousands of myofibrils per neuron, whilst the eye has but a few hundreds, or a few dozens in some cases. Hence eye movement is extremely delicate and slow in comparison to leg movements.

Fact: While Concentric contractions use X muscle fibers to apply muscle strength, Eccentric contractions use only 40% of those muscle fibers to apply the same muscle strength. Isometric contractions use 60%, and even those are more efficient than Concentric contractions.

Therefore, it stands to reason that comparing the developing power in these different contractions shows that during Eccentric contraction, the muscle is able to develop the same power using a smaller amount of motor units and by doing that, becoming more effective, more economic in terms of ATP/CrP usage, and should we load extra weight during the eccentric part of the exercise, we could be able to apply all of the motor units and eventually develop greater strength.

One of the most effective training methods is the 'Super Maximal Eccentric Workout'.
In this method, the trainee will operate against weight which is 30% larger than his RM1. The concentric contraction, which is obviously unable to be performed due to 130% of maximal strength being applied, is performed by a 2nd party (Another trainee or a trainer), while the eccentric contractions will be performed solely by the trainee, in a slow and controlled manner. This method is designated to the power development of strong and proficient athletes.

DOMS
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness, the phenomenon which the trainee receives a day or two days after the workout. The muscles are damaged, torn, constantly in repairs during that period, and are extremely sensitive to further contractions due to their periodic weakness.

Fact: Eccentric contractions hurt more than Concentric or Isometric contractions. Meaning, they cause even greater DOMS and provide with an overall greater and more efficient workout outcome.

Why So Slow?

As we've learned, muscle contraction works best when during Concentric contraction, the movement needs to be slow and fast when during Eccentric contraction.
What are the recommended time periods?

In every possible exercise or routine, the most recommended time period of concentric contraction is 2 seconds. The recommended time period of Eccentric contraction is 4 seconds. Indeed, 4 seconds - 200% the time of Concentric contraction.


isometric contractions did shit for me. 60% or not I lost muscle mass by doing those exercises. Eccentric ones I lost muscle mass as well but that's because I made something wrong. I had a break and started with eccentric ones so just over trained myself.
I actually had some benefit with eccentric ones when I used those for a short term, not more then 2 weeks and when my progress during normal training came to an halt.

Anyways your claim is isometric ones could be more beneficial then concentric ones if I understand you right.
Have you ever tried to train isometric ones for a longer period of time? I doubt you'll be making progress. Thing is, imagine a biceps curl. When you curl up first a lot of strain for a short time is on the lower part of the biceps and then goes further up the biceps as we curl it up. SO there is a lot of strain for a short time on individual parts. With isometric exercise there there is not such an intense strain on individual parts for a short time. Its for a longer time. I could imagine the results you get from isometric exercise similar to those you would get from concentric exercise ding a high amount of repetitions.

Concentric exercise gives when mentioning the biceps curl again intense strain on small individual parts of it for a short time and that's what's great for strength and bodybuilding. Also usually you get good in what you train and do not get as good in what you do not train. Hence if you train concentric exercises you will be better in performing concentric exercises as if you train isometric exercises. I doubt that training concentric exercises gives you any edge in competitions based on concentric exercises.

Sports are widely researched, there is good knowledge out there but despite what the benefits of isometric or eccentric exercise are I rarely see them being used by the best bodybuilders of the world. If they were that great I guess they would be using it being twice as big, which sounds just logically if it is true that iso and ecc put much more strian on your muscle fibers. But to be honest I am pretty sure they don't become twice as big by altering there routine to iso and ecc. exercises. Its just one of those things that work out through logical argumentation but when put into practice fails.

Anyways as I said I am not totally against it and eccentric ones could be useful as an augmentation to your routine as long as they are not used as the main form of training.

This post was edited by White_Light on Jan 16 2011 07:54am
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 16 2011 08:32am
Quote (White_Light @ Jan 16 2011 04:45pm)
isometric contractions did shit for me. 60% or not I lost muscle mass by doing those exercises. Eccentric ones I lost muscle mass as well but that's because I made something wrong. I had a break and started with eccentric ones so just over trained myself.
I actually had some benefit with eccentric ones when I used those for a short term, not more then 2 weeks and when my progress during normal training came to an halt.

Anyways your claim is isometric ones could be more beneficial then concentric ones if I understand you right.
Have you ever tried to train isometric ones for a longer period of time? I doubt you'll be making progress. Thing is, imagine a biceps curl. When you curl up first a lot of strain for a short time is on the lower part of the biceps and then goes further up the biceps as we curl it up. SO there is a lot of strain for a short time on individual parts. With isometric exercise there there is not such an intense strain on individual parts for a short time. Its for a longer time. I could imagine the results you get from isometric exercise similar to those you would get from concentric exercise ding a high amount of repetitions.

Concentric exercise gives when mentioning the biceps curl again intense strain on small individual parts of it for a short time and that's what's great for strength and bodybuilding. Also usually you get good in what you train and do not get as good in what you do not train. Hence if you train concentric exercises you will be better in performing concentric exercises as if you train isometric exercises. I doubt that training concentric exercises gives you any edge in competitions based on concentric exercises.

Sports are widely researched, there is good knowledge out there but despite what the benefits of isometric or eccentric exercise are I rarely see them being used by the best bodybuilders of the world. If they were that great I guess they would be using it being twice as big, which sounds just logically if it is true that iso and ecc put much more strian on your muscle fibers. But to be honest I am pretty sure they don't become twice as big by altering there routine to iso and ecc. exercises. Its just one of those things that work out through logical argumentation but when put into practice fails.

Anyways as I said I am not totally against it and eccentric ones could be useful as an augmentation to your routine as long as they are not used as the main form of training.


Losing muscle mass is completely nutrition based and lack of muscle stimulation for a prolonged time. If you've had muscle loss, it's been due to either poor nutrition, or lack of weight stacking.
You admitted to self overtraining, you cannot speak against Eccentric contraction workouts or against any workouts, if your core problem is overtraining.

I'm continuing to perform Isometric and Eccentric workouts constantly, slightly changing the routine to maintain variety and body awareness and reduce excessive repetition.

Perhaps you do not realize the meaning of Isometric training to the fullest. You cannot use it on every single exercise. Isometric biceps curl is something I've never heard of, because it doesn't exist. Google or ask around for the Isometric exercises and you'll understand which belong to which.

It is a scientific fact that Concentric contractions provide with less productivity due to bearing less weight in an overall even lesser time of strain. If you think Eccentric contractions are easy, you are not performing them correct at all. Each of them should incorporate 4 full seconds upon descending / contracting, at enormous weights in comparison to your body's abilities.
It is a fact that Concentric contractions recruit less motoric units at the cost of more energy. In overall effectiveness, Eccentric > Isometric > Concentric. There is no dispute in the matter. However it's not that black and white, meaning all 3 should be integrated at normal rate prioritization.

Not meaning to sound aggressive, but do you know those world-class bodybuilders personally? You're familiarized with their exact routines and what they do every day? I highly doubt that. Also, no juvenile sports magazine or tablet will show you hardcore facts on how the muscle operates, you have to go to medical articles and newspapers who actually research the inner-cellular activity, rather than interview some puff-head jock who recommends yet another supplement.

Facts are facts. My topic does not have an opinion, nor offers a dispute. Due to seeing many people here perform their Eccentric contractions in their videos in less than 1/2 a second, I realized this topic was necessary to explain to them why their gains and progress are sluggish and ineffective.
Member
Posts: 26,994
Joined: Oct 6 2007
Gold: 3.38
Jan 16 2011 09:13am
Good post, for the last couple of weeks I've been experimenting with isometric/eccentric contractions and I feel it way more than regular pullups
Weighted, hold the top position for 20 seconds, very slow negative. Feels good, man.

This post was edited by Mesonychid on Jan 16 2011 09:13am
Member
Posts: 2,069
Joined: Dec 30 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 16 2011 09:32am
[QUOTE=Synonym,Jan 16 2011 06:32am]Losing muscle mass is completely nutrition based and lack of muscle stimulation for a prolonged time. If you've had muscle loss, it's been due to either poor nutrition, or lack of weight stacking.
You admitted to self overtraining, you cannot speak against Eccentric contraction workouts or against any workouts, if your core problem is overtraining.

I admitted the problem was overtraining and eccentric ones were of benefit when I used them at the right time.

Perhaps you do not realize the meaning of Isometric training to the fullest. You cannot use it on every single exercise. Isometric biceps curl is something I've never heard of, because it doesn't exist.

If you add isometric exercise, as it brings about a change to your usually probably already adapted workout, maybe its beneficial. If you compare only concentric exercise to only isometric exercise, do you still think you get bigger by sticking to isometric exercise? Concerning isometric biceps curl: First we both know what a concentric biceps curl is. The isometric form of it I would guess would be to hold a barble at for example at a 90degrees angle with your biceps without moving.


It is a scientific fact that Concentric contractions provide with less productivity due to bearing less weight in an overall even lesser time of strain. If you think Eccentric contractions are easy, you are not performing them correct at all. Each of them should incorporate 4 full seconds upon descending / contracting, at enormous weights in comparison to your body's abilities.

Why is it better to provide a more even strain? For example (I know its a bad example, just trying to bring my point accross). in bodybuilding you want everything but something that is even, you strain something strongly then give it a break in order to strain it strongly again. You are always throwing breaks in your workouts. With concentric motion its similar. E.g the biceps curl first part full strain on the beginning of the biceps, then it can slightly relax while the upper parts will be strained more and then it will be strained again.

I think eccentric contractions are hard. Don't think I've said they are easy. If I did I didn't mean it.

The thing is that eccentric contractions are good aren't they? Eccentric contractions are not part of isometric exercise right? Variety is good right? With concentric contractions you will automatically do eccentric contractions as well. Its two different forms of muscle strain in one exercise. You cannot do that with eccentric or isometric contractions by themselves. I think that's a point that should not be overseen. Of course you can say that when youa re able to do the concentric part then you will not train the eccentric part efficiently because the weight is too light. Y but you can cheat a little with the concentric part or have a partner help you and just do the eccentric part in a more controlled strict way. That way there will be strain on the eccentric part. In addition to concentric exercises, they do not onyl give us the variability of training conc and ecc at the same time but for example with the bench press, one movement trains the outer part of the chest when the barbell is lifted from the chest, slowly putting more pressure on the inner part of it as we move us, affecting various different muscle fibers. Just to train all those muscle fibers with the isometric exercise you would have tot rain for ages, holding the barbell low, then low intermediate, interediate, high intermediate, high etc. If you involve a lot of different muscle fibers which is the case with full range of motion that's what's exhausting and gives you a hormonal boost. If you want to get big its not only about the % of muscle fibers used, its also whether the exercise gives you a good hormonal boost like squats or not and that's something I have not found research on. Do isometric exercises give you a better hormonal boost then concentric exercises that are eccentric at the same time?

Eccentric > Isometric > Concentric.

Variation > non-variation
Concentric includes eccentric. Hence more variation.
Eccentric > then Isometric, which is not included in isometric exercise.

Hence I believe if you do isometric only or concentric only (which includes eccentric) you get better results with the latter.


Not meaning to sound aggressive, but do you know those world-class bodybuilders personally? You're familiarized with their exact routines and what they do every day? I highly doubt that.

Its a mean question because you know its hard to give decent evidence for that. If they were using isometric exercise frequently I think i would have seen it sometimes in all those hundreds of pro bodybuilding exercise routines they show on youtube. Of course that is no evidence but I think its highly unlikely that if they were all doing isometric exercises as well that they would hide it in the videos because they want us not to become as good as they are.
Do you think they do a lot of isometric exercises?


This post was edited by White_Light on Jan 16 2011 09:35am
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 18 2011 12:19am
@White Light

There is no strict comparison between concentric & isometric contractions in overall workout routines, however it is a fact that while concentric contraction affects at 100% ratio, isometric affects at 110% of the that ratio, at a smaller energy expense. These are merely facts, not claims to disregard concentric contractions at all.

"Why is it better to provide with more strain?" Because the more motoric units you apply and the more workload you have at lesser energy expense, the more you receive from your workout. That much I believed to be obvious to anyone. In bodybuilding, weightlifting, powerlifting - It doesn't matter, you always strive to have the best out of your performance and that always means having the highest work load at the smallest energy expense, under the best terms (Proper form, proper timing etc).

You cannot say that "Concentric contractions have automatic eccentric contractions". That's just plain wrong. Concentric contraction refers to the movement of the muscle while shortening and overcoming the outer weight. Eccentric means the exact opposite, with 1 similarity- It's a contraction as well.

There is no need for variety when another method proves to be better than the first. The only variety your body needs is in routines and exercises. Getting the body through a similar routine for a long period of time will prove inefficient as the body will soon become accustomed to it, that much is true. It holds nothing whatsoever to having to perform concentric contractions at all. Workload is workload. Might as well perform it at the best possible scenario.

Again, you refer to those magazines and tabloids. They mean absolutely nothing, I never looked at one because I know they're full of bogus lies and advertisements.
Pick up a scientific or medical magazine, and just read the off-topics. You'd be amazed at what you can learn.
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Jan 3 2006
Gold: 75.00
Jan 18 2011 01:08am
So basically for this to work, you MUST do an eccentric exercise with your 130% RM? Would it work just as effective if I were to do it with 80% RM for a number of reps?

Good info, I will start to do negative pull ups with a 25 pound plate, counting to 4 of course :)

This post was edited by MegaVovaN on Jan 18 2011 01:09am
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jan 18 2011 01:33am
It all depends on the number of repetitions. And it's a trial & error thing. You cannot depict it will be 130% beforehand. It's merely a scientific statement.
Go Back To Health & Fitness Topic List
Prev1234511Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll