No amount of intellect or education will get you anywhere in life.

If you just but apply 1% of what you learned you would be ahead then 99% of the rest

Did I say beat some random person? No.
I said if you beat the BEST (aka not some random dude), then you become the best; but don't settle at that--push further and further to be better and better than that.


Your reading comprehension is so unbelievably bad...it makes it seem as if your strategy to argue is to claim I said something and then say that thing is wrong.

This post was edited by Morholt on Feb 17 2011 02:43pm

old versus commercial, thought it was pretty cool tho

These two below are very good.........
but who is the guy in the first photo?




This post was edited by TheOak on Feb 17 2011 03:22pm

dunno, but he's 100% man
































and about 150% photoshop.... STILL i am jelly like marmalade. Gz body/definition

Mcgrath

good thread

And who are you to QUALIFY someone as THE BEST?
Furthermore, who are you to say what their best is, or even what their limits are..?

So again, you are stating that you compare yourself TO SOME RANDOM PERSON who you DO NOT KNOW and have no comprehension OF WHAT THEY ARE FULLY CAPABLE OF, but you still just want to beat them..
Ya dude. I've tried to explain this to you from EVERY angle. Please try to understand that the only person you can JUDGE or QUALIFY is YOURSELF; Not any other individual.

thanks

You keep changing your argument.... (started as the retards in your childhood that said you could achieve certain things... WERE THEY THE BEST? NO. THEN WHY ARE YOU ARGUING THAT YOU ONLY TRY BEAT THE BEST????)

Do the Olympics--or any competition for the matter--not exist in your head? You certainly can determine someone's best performance. We have these things called systems of measurement, where we can, uh, you know....measure things.
Take a person's 100m dash time. At one point in their life, they will have ran their own personal record, which may or may not become the best in the world--which is QUANTIFIABLE by the MEASUREMENT of time, which can be recorded, as time is a CONSTANT. The system used is NOT arbitrary.
THAT is what qualifies for the best. THAT is how you know what someone is fully capable of--a person is capable of the things that they achieved; not a bunch of "well, if I had trained a little harder then" or "if I had eaten a little better" because that sleeping and eating is what you were capable of doing. No person needs any qualification to determine who is the best, as even a child can look at the numbers and see who is the best.
So, no, as I said before, I am not saying some random person. Just because you don't know Usain Bolt in person, that doesn't mean he's just some random dude.

Let me return you to the initial post your started your rant about:
So, where did I say my outlook was to beat the best?
I said I wanted to surpass the challenges laid out before me, and those doubtful of it happening were just fuel to make me want to surpass those challenges.

Wait--you're changing your argument now...you JUST said I am trying to beat the best.
But...didn't you say this?



Aren't YOU the one wants to be the best (even though I have already shown that being the best is being better than everyone else; as well as I never said anything about being better than someone else--only being better than people's prejudgments)?


Yet again, your argument is full of holes and is based on making claims as to what I said, though I never did.

This post was edited by Morholt on Feb 18 2011 02:41am

If you think you can EVER beat usain bolt than you are definitely autistic. AGAIN STOP TALKING ABOUT UNREALISTIC THINGS.


You have once again failed to mention how your original statement about random people in your childhood talking shit could have possibly been needed as motivation.
Look at you son, you are now talking about the olympics.



STOP talking about irrelevant shit!