Quote (TempoONE @ Mar 3 2012 01:57am)
Why do you have the splits as Chest / Bi instead of Chest / Tri's? Is this more efficient?
curious.jpg
Training chest with bis, back with tris, and so forth is training antagonistic muscle groups for the sake of building STRENGTH.
You can definitely reverse the muscle groups and make it chest/tris, back/bis, and so forth. However, when you are looking to build pure power and really focus on those accessories, you need to train antagonistically.
Here's why. When you train chest, it uses triceps. By the time you get to your triceps routine, your triceps are half fatigued and thus can not do the same kind of volume with isolated exercises. You will thus have good volume, but bad strength in the triceps.
If your goal is pure volume, it can be interchanged. If your goal is strength, it must be antagonistic groups. If your goal is both, I would stay with antagonistic groups.