lookin leaner bro. gj

you have potential

However, the number is an objective date if the bf. Some people hold fat differently. This last winter, after having gained around 50 lbs I was at my highest bf ever. Still had 6 pack perfectly visible at 225, but my lower back, on the other hand, was pretty fatty.

Balla just holds the fat the other way around.

Iso pic of you at 225lbs with a 6 pack.

That was in winter, and I'm not sure I got pics of abs. I took one of back because it's what improved the most. Will look for it though.

So no pic of 6 pack @ 225lbs?
Seriously, and this goes out to everyone, stop trying to excuse your compositions with lame excuses.
It's possible to have perfectly visible 4 pack and still have no striations, and 15% BF still. I was a prime example at 14%.
You can have a perfectly lean back and still have high %BF. That's because the absolute majority holds their fat at the center of mass. Your back isn't the center of mass, unless speaking of the lower region exclusively.

Reaching real visibility of the last two segments of the abdomen is extremely hard because it's the closest muscle group to the center of mass, and the deepest muscle connecting to the pubis.
The probability for anyone to have 10% without 6 pack visibility is slim to none. Even holocaust survivors famine-struck had visibility at that point.
The probability to have 12% with no ab visibility at all is 0.

I honestly don't really care what imaginative percentiles you give yourselves, just keep to fooling yourselves exclusively instead of trying to convince others.

I didn't say I was this or that % bf. I never tested it. What I said is I had visible abs at 225. And you're treating this as way too black-or-white. You can see string men at almost 18% with perfectly visible abs lol. It depends on their size too.

Show me a person with 18% BF and a full 6 pack.
Until then, keep to your Michael Jackson cliche of an argument.

This is not an argument. You're arguing. I said asking Balla to have fully defined 6 pack or else he's not 12 bf is unfair and ignorant, since everybody's body is different. You then simply resorted to spewing your data as usual, as if it settled the argument.

If you want to learn something, learn this already. Now even 10% of the body is in the books, and the information (or lack thereof) presented in them is but a guideline. Not keep on seeing the body as a machine which works mathematically and perfectly lok

This post was edited by ThomasPaine on Apr 24 2013 04:00am

Jimbo flips one up to the world of physiology in the most stunningly general and guessing statement he could conjure.
Don't talk to me about learning and not spewing when the most you've ever done was wiki a term.

this conversation has turned "ab"horrent