Quote (Lightman @ Jul 20 2012 01:11am)
1) gravity-induced polarity
of cytoplasmic streaming. Not of gravity
2) it's talking about a gravitational sub-atomic particle (assuming graviton) which is actually purely hypothetical at this stage. Being sub-atomic, it would even obey different rules of physics than the macroscopic world if it did exist. You cannot apply physics of the sub-atomic to macroscopic cases such as lifting weights, it's redundant.
3) i dont see a single mention of 'gravitational polarity'
it doesnt even look like you understand what are they talking about in #2, and since you like links, let me give you one:
http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1058.htmlfollowing the link below, it seems quite credible, despite being old (and in classical physics, nothing has really changed for many decades). 'Gravitational fields have no polarity at all.'
i would actually like you to explain what is 'gravitational polarity' in classical (aka Newtonian, macroscopic) physics, which is in question here, since i cant find a proper explanation.
e: as to bouncing, it is there despite being small, but also depends on the amount of external force exerted i.e. how controlled is the eccentric and other reasons ive mentioned earlier
This post was edited by Ocen on Jul 20 2012 07:25am