Quote (Justise @ Jan 1 2016 09:17pm)
This is the dumbest fucking argument of all time. By the time people are old enough to choose for themselves most people are fine keeping it as is. When your a baby you dont remember the pain.
I'm circumcised and quite happy that I was, but if I wasn't I doubt Id get the operation done now...
parents have complete authority over their kid, by your logic the parents couldn't make any medical decision for their child
There is no real benefit to circumcision, lol. If there is no medical indication, then it cannot be a medical decision made by the parents. We're talking about permanently removing a piece of the child's body and subjecting him to an unnecessary (albeit small) risk of complications. If you think there's a good reason for doing it, lmk. After all, why draw the line at circumcision? Might as well remove some other body parts cause "he wouldn't do it afterwards nor would he remember the pain".
You can't compare yourself to someone who's uncut cause you have no idea what it's like to be uncut. So while you may be ok with the situation, and indeed a lot of people are, you still can't compare and claim you're better off cut. An uncut person still has the possibility to get cut, but it doesn't quite work out vice versa.
This post was edited by Neptunus on Jan 1 2016 10:30pm