d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Health & Fitness > Accurate? > Measuring Raw Meat
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 357Replies: 14Track Topic
Member
Posts: 44,951
Joined: Oct 17 2007
Gold: 0.00
#11
Jan 29 2015 02:10pm
I just use a ruler
Member
Posts: 27,059
Joined: Nov 29 2006
Gold: 67.00
#12
Jan 29 2015 04:41pm
Quote (Hubris @ Jan 28 2015 11:46pm)
Chicken Stats

Raw: 553g
Cooked: 368g

By the way, I TORCH my chicken. Like, I cook it really thoroughly. The thought of biting into fleshy pink undercooked chicken literally makes me ecoli vomit in my mouth.


http://www.thekitchn.com/how-to-cook-moist-tender-chicken-breasts-every-time-cooking-lessons-from-the-kitchn-36891

best chicken you'll ever make
Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Aug 17 2008
Gold: 10.00
#13
Jan 29 2015 07:07pm
Quote (Lightman @ Jan 29 2015 11:19am)
Simplest solution: weight it raw.

I've been doing this with peameal. I measure 170g raw which amounts to 26g protein and once cooked, they weigh 65g approximately which doesn't seem like a lot of meat.
Member
Posts: 36,972
Joined: Aug 12 2007
Gold: 105.01
#14
Jan 29 2015 11:20pm
ight so I weigh it cooked since i make a weeks worth
I do 4oz cooked so thats 6oz raw? so 31.5g protein from it? if so this is great, i been tracking as 21
Member
Posts: 50,002
Joined: Apr 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
#15
Jan 30 2015 06:50am
Quote (Brule @ Jan 30 2015 03:07am)
I've been doing this with peameal. I measure 170g raw which amounts to 26g protein and once cooked, they weigh 65g approximately which doesn't seem like a lot of meat.


that's because it's drained of nearly all the water it had precooked. those 170g held about 60% water that have no energy yielding nutrients, and have evaporated post cooking.
Go Back To Health & Fitness Topic List
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact