here I am going for 12 reps in a warm up set, then 6-8 reps for some pretty difficult sets and then squeezing out 4 ish reps on a few very difficult sets.

then I hear from Rich Piana that muscle growth largely depends on getting a pump in the muscle, which is easily achieved by high reps and reps till failure. is that just because he is referring to what people should do on steroids or for everyone (including us natties)?

do yourself a favor and don't listen to rich about anything.

Didn't watch vid but there is merit to this.

Google fibre damage / muscle saturation

It basically means the pump helps

does that mean a mixture of high reps low weight to get a good pump + heavy weights for low reps is optimal? as opposed to SOLELY going for heavy weights and low reps

This post was edited by dro94 on Dec 17 2014 10:22am

LOL

Correlation doesn't imply causation

Was expecting broscience video.

It also means morons love to hear bullshit.

cumming in front of 5,000 people, I'm cumming day and night it's terrific

imo that guys cussing makes him sound dumb and he uses his big physique to his advantage w/o having to provide any scientific evidence

This post was edited by ug_warrior(xtc) on Dec 17 2014 02:08pm