Quote (ringo794 @ 18 Jun 2016 08:56)
I don't understand how this relates to magnetism.
I understand why there was an oscillation between 3 and 9, and I understand all the math you are doing.
I've got a degree in Physics so this is my sort of interest, but it doesn't seem like you argued any points other than how to do this vortex math.
It also seems like you don't believe in Quantum Mechanics. There is pretty substantial evidence, however, that the world is not always 100% predictable and does require some variability that seems well modeled by Quantum.
The shape as a 2d perspective of a double helix,
the double helix in nature is "wound" by magneticANDdielectric vortex coming out of the N/S and E/W poles of an electrified dielectric object.
*not subject to the content of this image
I think Quantum Mechanics is the correct direction for particle physics, but being rooted in particles, it is contaminated. My main objection to QM is really just it's lack of pi.
It's important to mention QM will soon show evidence graviton with an E/W dielectric plane of inertia and a N/S energy vortex as I describe.This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 18 2016 08:28am
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.