Gravity Debunked - Topic

Member

Posts: 64,732

Joined: Oct 25 2006

Gold: 260.11

Jun 24 2016 05:03pm

You need to go back to dimensional analysis and English before you're going to debunk anything. Start with how to define words and work your way up.

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#92

Jun 24 2016 05:23pm

Quote (Thor123422 @ 24 Jun 2016 18:03)

You need to go back to dimensional analysis and English before you're going to debunk anything. Start with how to define words and work your way up.

Quote (Devil_kin @ 24 Jun 2016 00:59)

no, you sprinkle true fact into your arguments and draw ridiculous conclusions like every other sophist and cook

How is it ridiculous conclusion to say that magnetism causes gravity?
The common consensus is of magnetism causing mass which turns into gravity to cause gravity.

Seems like all I did was trim the relativity fat, never even sprinkled anything in.

Thor123422

Member

Posts: 64,732

Joined: Oct 25 2006

Gold: 260.11

#93

Jun 24 2016 05:27pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 24 2016 05:23pm)

I made scientific definitions, mathematical definitions, pictorial definitions, simple relative definitions, observational definitions.
Seems like English and math aren't your forte.
How about you go back to being lost since I haven't said anything about dimensions here.

How is it ridiculous conclusion to say that magnetism causes gravity?
The common consensus is of magnetism causing mass which turns into gravity to cause gravity.

Seems like all I did was trim the relativity fat, never even sprinkled anything in.

You made word salad, and that's what you did just now. You just reinforce that you don't know what a definition is since you think pictoral and simple relative are types of definition.

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,598

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 5,388.33

#94

Jun 24 2016 05:37pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 24 2016 01:38pm)

I never said the earth was flat.
You clearly have zero compression skills it's a wonder you've survived this long without accidentally hanging yourself on a lamp cord.

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 23 2016 09:00pm)

No that's for the geometry shape
the one on the picture, high=1/phi^-3=low is the pressure
& I don't have the z axis, as the center of the dielectric plane of inertia is a flywheel that has variables in pressure respective to proximity to total center.
"Gravity" is a 3d occurrence based on very obsucre and vague xyz.

This is where I've been stuck and why I was looking at flat earth.

no you just talk about it often. What was the insane idea you followed then, hollow earth? You avoided the first part of my question about UFOs being essential to your anti-gravity technology

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 24 2016 03:23pm)

The common consensus is of magnetism causing mass which turns into gravity to cause gravity.

where are you getting this idea from?

This post was edited by majorblood on Jun 24 2016 05:40pm

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#95

Jun 24 2016 08:19pm

Quote (Thor123422 @ 24 Jun 2016 18:27)

You made word salad, and that's what you did just now. You just reinforce that you don't know what a definition is since you think pictoral and simple relative are types of definition.

You want a perfect definition on Greek too? Cause Plato described the whole shape with 2 words.

Quote (majorblood @ 24 Jun 2016 18:37)

no you just talk about it often. What was the insane idea you followed then, hollow earth? You avoided the first part of my question about UFOs being essential to your anti-gravity technology

"UFO" technology is an example of the persistence of this idea, since even secret government work dives into the possibility of gravity being broken by magnetism,
Meaning magnetism reigns supreme, to me, and my math.

You bring it up often, as I defend the validity of many of the questions the movement in FET brings to light.

Quote

where are you getting this idea from?

After work I'll explain special relativity to you again

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 24 2016 08:21pm

Thor123422

Member

Posts: 64,732

Joined: Oct 25 2006

Gold: 260.11

#96

Jun 24 2016 08:29pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 24 2016 08:19pm)

You want a perfect definition on Greek too? Cause Plato described the whole shape with 2 words.
http://i.imgur.com/qhm0mAU.jpg
"UFO" technology is an example of the persistence of this idea, since even secret government work dives into the possibility of gravity being broken by magnetism,
Meaning magnetism reigns supreme, to me, and my math.
You bring it up often, as I defend the validity of many of the questions the movement in FET brings to light.
After work I'll explain special relativity to you again

I'd be fine if you gave one decent definition, or did some meditating on the definition you just posted.

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#97

Jun 25 2016 12:45am

Quote (Thor123422 @ 24 Jun 2016 21:29)

I'd be fine if you gave one decent definition, or did some meditating on the definition you just posted.

Magnetism is that which props up 100% of the known universe.
I have the 2 out of the 3 formulas accounting for xy-axis
I have a logical elaboration and plenty of denotation

Quote

ˈmaɡnəˌtizəm, noun:
A reciprocating processional hyperboloid that can only extrapolate itself out in field pressure mediation, a hypertrochoidal procession.

Quote

Prodo'sai, Logos, & Anangke

And that is exactly what I showed you a magnet doing, effecting the coaxial emission of light transmission.

Now find me one of your text books now that explains how that's possible,
or gravity is nothing other than incoherent dielectric acceleration that falls effectively under my magnet math & it's time to move on .

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,598

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 5,388.33

#98

Jun 25 2016 12:47am

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 24 2016 10:45pm)

Magnetism is that which props up 100% of the known universe.

so are we pretending that magnetism is the only force now?

MaliceMizer

Member