you're right

riling up the entirity of america over whether or not a gun is a certain type of gun or how hard it was or wasnt for the murderer to get the gun is totally not going to delay a murderer from doing it again somewhere else next time

right those r assault weapons i ment wat sep a assault rifle from weapon is rate of fire
like the m16 m4a1 have choice of burst or fully

People need to accept that it's entirely possible for people with differing world views to injure or kill each other, blending them together without reasonable efforts to acculturate is what is dangerous.

Actually, only one of those was classified as an "assault weapon" for purposes of the AWB. Yet, in the same hands, both rifles will put the same number of the same caliber cartridge downrange in the same amount of time. They are functionally identical, but only one was banned. Do you see the problem with arbitrary nomenclature, and banning guns solely because of cosmetic features?

personal beliefs aside, before i continue reading your responses and responding to them

are you pro or against being able to own any type of firearm? where is the "limit" if you are for and how much should we "ban" the guns if you are against?

i did not sift through this thread to see what your stance was but i can make sense of your responses from that questions answer

right i never said we shud ban them. jus rzchaos or w/e got off topic talkin bout wich is wich.
and wat makes it wat.

imo the limit shud be like rocket launchers n shit lol
u cant take those to the range lol

This post was edited by Maddog402 on Jun 15 2016 11:27pm

I don't own any firearms, don't really have an interest. I just believe that people should be free to make their own decisions.

i see