You really paid for a name change like that lol. Meanwhile i struggle to get a name change myself lol considering i gave most of my items in all game away to friends.

10/10 Troll.

"Theory" doesn't mean "we aren't sure."

A theory is an explanation for a given phenomenon. We know evolution happens, that cannot be disputed, and the "theory of evolution" is how it happens. This really isn't up for debate.

/e And don't confuse evolution with abiogenesis. When you do you just sound ignorant.

This post was edited by Mastersam93 on Oct 24 2014 08:03pm

there are some things that people are unwilling to change their opinions/beliefs/positions on

drakwen, i don't believe there is a single thing i can say or resource i can show that would convince you that macroevolution is scientific fact, because you've already decided that it isn't, instead of deciding to believe what is most reasonable given the evidence you have

Damn... this didn't need 7 pages. Y'all could have just said 'because I'm ignorant and misinformed and can't be bothered to look at a website that wasn't made by the Institute for Creationist Research'.

they are seperate species that they put in a line, nothing to point that this evolved into that, and even if there was solid proof, it still does not explain how we came about which is the real arguement here.

id love to know how they come to the conclusion that things are 50-100 million years old when the most accurate 'scientific' method of dating is carbon dating and in the scientific community this is accurate to what 50000-60000 years? there is so much muddled up confused shit in this scientific 'theory' which is regarded by many as fact and relatively explained with circle logic over and over again that there is no wonder that anyone with a brain in their head has to question it.

Missing link theory.

Where is the animal that looks half like me and half like my baby?

lol drakwen great troll

being accurate to 50,000-60,000 years on a 50,000,000-100,000,000 timescale is -incredibly- accurate



similarities and same features from one skeleton to the next, in a linear or branched pattern. that is hat points that "this evolved into that"



actually, the real argument here as written in the op is evolution, which explains the process by which life changes over time
it does NOT explain the origin of life, or claim to do so

1) Scientists have some very good ideas on how life originated. Amino acids, the building blocks for proteins and life, are created naturally in water with the given chemicals and mineral catalysts. I.E. conditions on Earth. These amino acids can also be found in asteroids. To put it simply, physics lead to chemical reactions that lead to life.

2) When talking about something 100 million years old, 60,000 years is a small amount.

3) There is no confusion among people that understand it, there is no circular logic, no scientists question this.

GIEB CHEEZ