Quote (Devil_kin @ 1 Jul 2016 17:01)
there are countries that couldn't sustain their population without animal farming, those cases are not immoral because the suffering isn't arbitrary. by even bringing that up you're showing you don't understand the moral principle i'm talking about. as far as wealthy countries go, it's usually cheaper to sustain off things other than meat but if that's not the case then phasing out meat farming would increase production in other areas making the alternatives cheaper
This just sounds like a bunch of hypocritical bullshit lmao. You can't use double standards to justify an argument like this. To not eat meat is only a subject of a one's personal morals. You can't use your own morals to condemn others when it comes to matter such as this otherwise you are being hypocritical for the reasons I've previously stated.
Also if you understood how expensive protein would become without this farming you'd realize how dumb the idea is. Nuts would be in huge demand and they are already expensive. Low class people can't really afford to spend that kind of money already on such a substance and it isn't even in high demand yet.
Imagine if it was. I don't people in 1st world countries with the income I live would be able to afford it. We'd be nutrient starved.
This post was edited by ChrisKz on Jul 1 2016 03:07pm