Quote (doomchaser @ May 2 2016 09:10pm)
There is enough of a connection for logical conclusion that fracking can, and does cause earthquakes ... As far as i am concerned..
if "some random lady reading satire" and a vague correlation on a usgs website is enough for you, who am i to call you stupid, stupid.
Quote
and I can look up to see a chemical reaction in the sky that goes beyond what a water vapor will create..
based on what? you just proved you don't know or even care about how science works, how am i supposed to believe anything you say in a scientific context?
Quote
If only through science can you come to these conclusions I really feel sorry for you..
yep, thats pretty much how intelligent people come to any conclusion, based on the evidence (empirical evidence, not heresay)
Quote
Because no one has the time or capability to apply such science to everything in nature, to see how things work..
noone has the time to watch 500 youtube videos either, which form of evidence would you prefer for discerning truth? what people say, or what the data shows?
Quote
Most of the time we just accept others confirmation of things, without actually doing the work for ourselves
thats exactly the issue i'm trying to adress, stop taking peoples word and start doing the research, it wouldnt even take much data to convince me fracking can cause earthquakes, but what youve given thus far is literally nothing (minor correlation and a lady on a satire website)
Quote
..If they tell you what you see is not real you accept it?
NO! thats the point, you shouldn't believe what anyone tells you about anything, you should check for yourself, run some tests, check the numbers, its insane to beleive things based on anecdotal testimony
This post was edited by dude_927 on May 2 2016 08:20pm