d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > General Archive >
Poll > Gravity Debunked
Prev12930313233Next
Add Reply New Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 51,221
Joined: Jun 3 2010
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 50%
Jul 1 2016 05:36am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jul 1 2016 07:37am)
So fat his magnetic field is repulsive of the earth's.


Maybe fat people on the other side of the flat planet help balance us
Member
Posts: 13,324
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Jul 1 2016 05:40am
Quote (Tuna_BeIIy @ 1 Jul 2016 06:36)
Maybe fat people on the other side of the flat planet help balance us



You just solved global warming
Member
Posts: 51,221
Joined: Jun 3 2010
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 50%
Jul 1 2016 05:41am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jul 1 2016 08:10am)
You just solved global warming


If we have nasa spin us away from the sun
Member
Posts: 32,208
Joined: Nov 27 2010
Gold: 159.02
Jul 1 2016 05:50am
gravity status: debunked
Member
Posts: 13,324
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Jul 1 2016 06:01am
Quote (Devil_kin @ 1 Jul 2016 06:50)
gravity status: debunked



blaze it
Member
Posts: 7,855
Joined: Apr 25 2016
Gold: 222.46
Jul 1 2016 07:12am
Gravity's debunked guys get over it.
Member
Posts: 13,324
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Jul 2 2016 04:16am
Quote (majorblood @ 30 Jun 2016 20:08)
still waiting for a mathematical law to express your system that replaces gravity like :zzz:



ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω.











Magnetomotive force: F= Phi x R
Dielectric force = Phi/LxT (Weber per centimeter-second)
Magnetic force = Psi/LxT (Coulombs per centimeter-second)
Electromagnetic induction: E (volts) = Phi/time
Magneto-dielectric induction: I (Amps) = Psi/time








Since gravity and dielectricity are conjugated pairs, gravity is sourced in mass, but it's field is mass and particle free.
Gravity itself is a positive polarity, circular centripetal-emanative field with a negative pressure gradient, whose negative polarity is in counterspace.
Matter and magnetism, both being polarized, accumulate spatially while their inertial pairs electricity and dielectricity accumulate in the counterspatial.












Mass does not attract mass, rather the “strong nuclear force” of a dielectric (dielectricity) causes an accumulative centripetal vortex that accelerates masses towards each other in equilibrium-seeking pressure gradients.

Chicken vs. egg, just like I told ya from the start.


Quote
“It is inconceivable that inanimate Matter should, without the mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon, and affect other matter without mutual contact. Gravity should be innate, inherent and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance thru a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and course may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into (for) it.
Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.”

- Sir Isaac Newton


But you can't have your cake and eat it too.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jul 2 2016 04:20am
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Jul 2 2016 04:22am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jul 2 2016 02:16am)
ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω.





http://i.imgur.com/CSHqAuU.png





Magnetomotive force: F= Phi x R
Dielectric force = Phi/LxT (Weber per centimeter-second)
Magnetic force = Psi/LxT (Coulombs per centimeter-second)
Electromagnetic induction: E (volts) = Phi/time
Magneto-dielectric induction: I (Amps) = Psi/time





Since gravity and dielectricity are conjugated pairs, gravity is sourced in mass, but it's field is mass and particle free.
Gravity itself is a positive polarity, circular centripetal-emanative field with a negative pressure gradient, whose negative polarity is in counterspace.
Matter and magnetism, both being polarized, accumulate spatially while their inertial pairs electricity and dielectricity accumulate in the counterspatial.





http://i.imgur.com/g0rmxzf.png






Mass does not attract mass, rather the “strong nuclear force” of a dielectric (dielectricity) causes an accumulative centripetal vortex that accelerates masses towards each other in equilibrium-seeking pressure gradients.

Chicken vs. egg, just like I told ya from the start.



- Sir Isaac Newton


But you can't have your cake and eat it too.

still waiting for a mathematical law to express your system that replaces gravity like :zzz:
Member
Posts: 13,324
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Jul 2 2016 04:46am
Quote (majorblood @ 2 Jul 2016 05:22)
still waiting for a mathematical law to express your system that replaces gravity like :zzz:

You missed the point. You need me to spoon feed you?
Newton’s equation is not about force.

F=ma in Faraday's words, so you may no longer draw your own conclusion on the chicken vs egg issue:

Voidance = dielectricity as measured in mass x acceleration.
Dielectric Voidance = M1 x M2/Distance^2



gg I lose
such a travesty to philosophy... but then again you seek no understanding, just answers.


This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jul 2 2016 04:49am
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Jul 2 2016 09:59pm
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jul 2 2016 02:46am)
You missed the point. You need me to spoon feed you?
Newton’s equation is not about force.

F=ma in Faraday's words, so you may no longer draw your own conclusion on the chicken vs egg issue:

Voidance = dielectricity as measured in mass x acceleration.
Dielectric Voidance = M1 x M2/Distance^2



gg I lose
such a travesty to philosophy... but then again you seek no understanding, just answers.


still waiting for a mathematical law to express your system that replaces gravity like :zzz:
Go Back To General Archive Topic List
Prev12930313233Next
Add Reply New Topic