Quote (dude_927 @ May 2 2016 06:29pm)
not a personal attack (might wanna work on definitions of words too), it was the most impersonal of attacks possible and not even an attack, you genuinely don't understand a lick of how scientific investigation works and i had already tried the direct approach, so i tried the sarcastic one. Thats the thing about science, its empirical, you cant just deny it away, real empirical data speaks for itself. If youre dealing in a world of correlations and anecdotal evidence, you'll never prove anything to anyone, i'm trying to make you see things fro ma scientific perspective, apologies if i have offended (tbh, i expected much more vitriol from you)
i was in no way encouraging your stupidity Seems like it was personal attack.. as you could not deny the simple facts i posted.. you try to discredit the author for their stupidity ..Like tactical shrills do ..1 USGS Admits there is a connection to earthquakes caused by fracking ..you deny this...... 2 then you claim i am just stupid ... 3 then you claim you did not get personal?
Science works? How does science work? I thought science is just the study of things to predict a outcome..please explain how you make science work?