Start by clarifying your position a bit.

Are you claiming that like charges attract?

what, who thinks that ?
nobody who has taken even physics 101 I would hope >.<

Forgot to edit, see next post.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 30 2016 04:37pm

Okay, so I read through and followed the math, and it's valid until you get to the conclusion. There isn't anything you have said that implies anything about electric charges. You've got a big jump in logic on the last line.

Our intuition about gravity is just that, an intuition. Intuitions can be wrong. The strength of gravity being equal is because both objects are influenced by both fields, you don't need to incorporate anything about charges for this to be the case.

You can easily demonstrate that like charges repel each other though, just by using balloons like Azrad says. There are a few instances where this might not be the case, like in what you posted, but the exceptions are only for special circumstances like distances on the order of 10 picometers. However these instances are still understandable in the context that like charges repel and unlike charges attract.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 30 2016 04:44pm

Rather than a rule "like charges repel each other"' it
is "charges which repel each other are said to be like charges".

If you want to understand a magnetic universe, but can’t because your logic won’t let you,
the pitiful solution is to maybe recognize that we are definitely ignorant about how the universe works as a whole.
We have approximations for the most critical aspects of our math, that we use to project millennia and call it fact.

As humans we can build models that seem to explain a lot, but they’re skewed to what we have been measuring since the invention of the square, matter, and matter is subject to biases we don’t know as a civilization.
I'm solving some biases demonstrably, and since there's no guruship directions for correspondence, I see no reason why they can't be discussed anywhere.

To me it's foolish to believe we have any kind of certainty about how shit works. Even the world’s top physicists are probably more aware of their own ignorance than we are of ours.

Every advance in physics shows us that the universe is far stranger than we had previously imagined.
Space is curved now? What?

So my logic from what I can measure with newer technologies than a square and the perspective of someone who believes that the universe is absolute rhyme and reason, instead of inconsistencies, is to connect new discoveries to old problems.

Most of what I claim will probably be obsoleted by future advancement, like when we start measuring with plasma, but there's nothing I see behind me that holds any weight for the facts I am bringing you.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 30 2016 05:39pm

still waiting for a mathematical law to express your system that replaces gravity like

is this still a thing

The ignorance of physics here is really astounding. You could shatter your world view by taking a physics 101 or history of science class. There's a huge body of knowledge you aren't even aware of that goes beyond "repelling charges are labelled as the same".

The ignorance here is honestly astounding. I'm not joking when I say you don't even have a high school understanding of physics or history of science. This is a sad fact.

You never actually made an argument for your position, you just suggested that we don't know everything, so science might be wrong. That's true in only the most pedantic sense for classical mechanics. You could make that argument about more advanced levels, but classic mechanics is pretty well nailed down, and classical mechanics describes 99.9% of the entire universe.