You're losing it man,
you need to take a break go reevaluate & call your loved ones.

Poor troll is poor

The real question is how does trash get into space..

Once again, doesn't show what you think it does. The experiment where the static due to electrons isn't sufficient was only done for one type of particle and can't necessarily be generalized to other systems. You aren't good at being a skeptic, you just cherry pick lines that support your conclusion without understanding them in context.

Specifically the context here is for same material, different size particles, but the theory of trapped electrons still works for other things and roughly same sized particles like balloons.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 29 2016 05:36pm

Yeah you haven't depicted anything

Also lololol @ positive and negative electrons. You're so ignorant you don't even know what charge an electron always has

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 29 2016 08:12pm

]



Nope just paraphrasing because work.








My depicted torus
Looks exactly like the "mosaic" static field, so there's that.

You're getting really desperate as this all clicks huh?

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 29 2016 10:21pm

My dick defies gravity daily.

I'm not getting desperate. I just showed you have no comprehension of two sources and you dropped them like a ton of bricks when it became obvious to you as well.

You still haven't defined "dielectricity", the torus looks nothing like the mosaic model of surface electric charge, and you haven't substantiated that "dielectricity repels magnetism".

When you say "contrary to common belief opposites do not attract" are you referring to positive and negative charges? Because the two sources we just got done discussing both rest heavily on the fact that opposite charges do attract, so IF that is what you are claiming you actually just relied on two sources that prove you wrong.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 30 2016 05:08am