Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jun 15 2016 02:58pm)
The first dude is a bartender in a gay club and their 'proof' that he's in on the hoax is that he has IMDb credits. He's a fucking bartender in a gay club who wanted to act, ffs, how does that prove anything?
The second is the mother of a victim who wanted to be on Wheel of Fortune. Again, an older white lady wanted to be on a game show, therefore she must be willing to lie about someone she loved dying, right?
The third is literally just them saying "Well, I don't think that this guy's emotional response 12 hours after his friend was murdered is appropriate." This is a pervasive idea with these dumb theories, and flies in the face of how people actually grieve. Grief doesn't have one single way that it's properly expressed, especially not when the wounds are still incredibly fresh like they were for Andy Moss. Saying that he has to be faking because he's not crying as much as the narrator wants (A narrator so removed from the idea of grieving for the loss of a loved one that he has to use his wife as an example rather than anything from his own life) is just fucking ridiculously stupid and again, proves absolutely nothing.
The fourth guy was some rand who lived across the street, and the only evidence they have is that he was a complete asshole when he was trying to run for a local public office and he smokes weed. Again, what in the fuck does that have to do with anything and how does that mean that anything that happened is fake? If he was even close to the only witness, there might be some reason to cast doubt on his story. But he's not, and the fact that he smoked some weed and got mad at someone's campaign manager doesn't actually say anything about the story being false. It just says that this happened in the presence of an asshole.
The fifth is that one person out of the hundred people who were killed or injured got incredibly lucky and didn't have any major organs hit. That's literally 1% of the people who were shot. Yes, it's lucky, but you're going to get some lucky people when there are 100 examples.
The two examples of green screen simply aren't. There's no reason to think that they are, either. It's simply ridiculous and baseless.
The fact that a cop - especially an older cop - is able to smile and laugh while dealing with a horrific crime scene isn't much of a surprise at all, and again proves absolutely nothing. Wow, some cops are desensitized to violence.
The last one is actually something that's literally been explained. Not the fact that the call dropped - calls get dropped all the time, that's not particularly surprising or noteworthy. But there was a dude who held the door shut in an alley. An interview with the guy was posted in GC, even. There's nothing surprising about it - and what does it prove, anyway? If the whole thing was a staged hoax, why would there need to be someone holding the door shut?
There you go. That's everything in your dumb video. Now please read that Cracked article I linked, which should take you much less time and should help you understand exactly how poisonous and vile these dumb conspiracy theories are.
sure is alot of excuses
im not saying its a hoax real people died but looks like the gun man did not act alone and the goverment looks to have a hand in it
The two examples of green screen simply aren't. There's no reason to think that they are, either. It's simply ridiculous and baseless.
srs?
This post was edited by MillerT1meUp on Jun 15 2016 08:32pm