d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > General Archive >
Poll > Gravity Debunked
Prev1131415161733Next
Add Reply New Topic
Views: 4993Replies: 323
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#141
Jun 26 2016 12:07am
Quote (majorblood @ 26 Jun 2016 00:34)
http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/tamarack.htm here is a write up on it after an equal google search

from the article


the article goes into detail about the divergence and everything related to this experiment if you are interested.

Ya I posted a ss of this page on my science thread, as I am aware some attribute the results to thermodynamics and air current.
And I'm not buying it.
Also his assumption was that of a convex earth with gravity in the space, mine is concave and supported by magnetic evidence.
The same experiment is performed above ground to supposedly prove to coriolis effect, being performed with plumb lines, can be equally tainted so either both are invalid or both are legitimate.


You can't eat your cake and have it too.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 26 2016 12:11am
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#142
Jun 26 2016 12:10am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 26 2016 12:07am)
Ya I posted a ss of this page on my science thread, as I am aware some attribute the results to thermodynamics and air current.
And I'm not buying it.
The same experiment is performed above ground to supposedly prove to coriolis effect, being performed with plumb lines, can be equally tainted so either both are invalid or both are legitimate.


You can't eat your cake and have it too.


If you "aren't buying it" it's your job to show that the experiments are tainted, and when repeating the experiments with the air currents absent that you don't get the same result.

The ball is in your court, but I'll already predict you drop it.
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
#143
Jun 26 2016 12:17am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 26 Jun 2016 01:10)
If you "aren't buying it" it's your job to show that the experiments are tainted, and when repeating the experiments with the air currents absent that you don't get the same result.

The ball is in your court, but I'll already predict you drop it.



I have experiments that haven't been performed a million times to do.

My Aryan Gold mining family Garnet Ghost Town, Montana ritualistically performs this as a form of induction as we decend from a lineage of genocidal motherfuckers.
When my little brother gets back from Costa Rica we'll do it again.

Right after cold moon, magnet motor, entanglement, sustained pearl levitation, atomic matter effecting time and pmemba effect absolution./B]
Member
Posts: 53,598
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 5,388.33
#144
Jun 26 2016 12:17am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 25 2016 10:07pm)
Ya I posted a ss of this page on my science thread, as I am aware some attribute the results to thermodynamics and air current.
And I'm not buying it.
Also his assumption was that of a convex earth with gravity in the space, mine is concave and supported by magnetic evidence.
The same experiment is performed above ground to supposedly prove to coriolis effect, being performed with plumb lines, can be equally tainted so either both are invalid or both are legitimate.


You can't eat your cake and have it too.


your assumption is unreasonable and without any evidence and easily dismissed while the assumption of a convex earth is supported by every credible source of science relating to the shape of the earth

you have a lot of work to do
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 25 2016 10:17pm)
I have experiments that haven't been performed a million times to do.

My Aryan Gold mining family Garnet Ghost Town, Montana ritualistically performs this as a form of induction as we decend from a lineage of genocidal motherfuckers.
When my little brother gets back from Costa Rica we'll do it again.

Right after cold moon, magnet motor, entanglement, sustained pearl levitation, atomic matter effecting time and pmemba effect absolution./B]


are you on some sort of drug?

This post was edited by majorblood on Jun 26 2016 12:18am
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#145
Jun 26 2016 12:18am
Show me a logical experiment that shows Gravity and until then it's only a crazy theory. The ball is now in your court.

And not red shift theory, because that was only used to further pad the credibility of the Big Bang Theory and without proof of gravity - the big bang theory is complete horse shit.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 26 2016 12:22am
Member
Posts: 53,598
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 5,388.33
#146
Jun 26 2016 12:19am
Quote (card_sultan @ Jun 25 2016 10:18pm)
Show me a logical experiment that shows Gravity and until then it's only a crazy theory. The ball is now in your count.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity

pick one
Member
Posts: 6,718
Joined: Jul 2 2008
Gold: 4.41
#147
Jun 26 2016 12:20am
Quote (card_sultan @ Jun 26 2016 06:18am)
Show me a logical experiment that shows Gravity and until then it's only a crazy theory. The ball is now in your count.




Get your balls outta the count.




This post was edited by MrSkales on Jun 26 2016 12:21am
Member
Posts: 7,855
Joined: Apr 25 2016
Gold: 222.46
#148
Jun 26 2016 12:20am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 26 2016 05:43am)
They would have to be if I am to bend light with magnets, right? According to your own particle physics?



You haven't defended gravity, relativity or heliocentrism once as I walk all over them,
instead you just make retarded accusations of my personal inadequacy.
Your opinion is absolutely invalid, while all you appear to be capable of is expressing the conjectures of other men.

if ur just 2 smrt to be required to answer for what you already believe in;
How about a theory on why moon light is cold?
The Talos hum?
deja vu? Intuition?
The Portuguese Miracle of the Sun?
backwards Gravity hills?
Krishna's Butter Ball?
Spontaneous human combustion?
How about Tesla & Einstein's Philadelphia experiment?

The tamarack mines experiments?
Any theories on why heliocentrism failed Airy's experiment?

nah, you've got nothing, because you've apparently never had an original thought in your life, so you seek to belittle those who do.


You have yet to actually dispute any evidence.
You have yet to show any technical or mathematical proficiency.
You have yet to show the capability of participating in intelligent discussion.


I dont think he thinks that's why seconds and meters are different
And how does any of this relate to the magic numerology circle
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#149
Jun 26 2016 12:24am
Quote (majorblood @ Jun 26 2016 01:19am)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity

pick one


you actually need to prove gravity first for any of those theories to have credibility, like Red shift theory as I explained, its complete horse shit.

Here Einstein's theory of gravity, notice how the ball just falls into the Sun - #physics fail magic



This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 26 2016 12:30am
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
#150
Jun 26 2016 12:42am
Quote (majorblood @ Jun 26 2016 12:17am)

are you on some sort of drug?


Almost guaranteed
Go Back To General Archive Topic List
Prev1131415161733Next
Add Reply New Topic

© 2003-2024 d2jsp  Contact