Helt enig.

syntes det er en amatør film

tog Osama bin laden ikke selv skylden for 9/11 ?
tror ikke meget på at der har været placeret bomber i kælderen, det ville være underligt hvis man kunne placere bomber i 2 kæmpe skyskrabere som er USA / New Yorks kende teng uden at nogen har lagt mærke til noget

i flere af de konspirationsteorier som ligger på youtube siger de sådan noget pladder med at jern først smelter ved + 2000 grader
og at den varme der opstod i WTC blev maks 600 grader så der må ha været bomber i kælderen
de undlader at sige at jern bliver blødt når det når omkring de 600 grader

This post was edited by IAcid on Feb 26 2012 08:09am

i ved tydeligvis ikke særlig meget omkring tårnene

så lad os snakke om flyene..

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

hvorfor er flere af flyene flyvende andre steder ifølge piloternes systemer ? når de burde være inde i tårnene og pentagon ?

det er hverken teori eller hva i ellers vil kalde det... det er facts

udover det... har set utallige vidne forklaringer og alle siger at det ligner militær fly og der inden vinduer var i.. det stemmer sådan set rimelig godt overens med hva piloterne her siger

teknisk fejl på samtlige systemer eller konspirations teori ?

ved i hvad der er konspirationsteori ? at tro på det bullshit usa siger... der er intet af det de har sagt der kan passe eller er beviser for

Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this "texting" system. ACARS was developed in 1978 and is still used today. Similar to cell phone networks, the ACARS network has remote ground stations installed around the world to route messages from ATC, the airline, etc, to the aircraft depending on it's location and vice versa. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier? Pilots For 9/11 Truth have briefly touched on this subject in 9/11: Intercepted through the excellent research of "Woody Box", who initially discovered such alarming information in the released FOIA documents(1). We now have further information which confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred

This post was edited by lulzz on Feb 26 2012 08:57am

1540 grader før det smelter og brandene indenfor var max 800 hvis ik nærmere 600

nok til at gøre dem bløde omkring branden.. ik nok til at blødgøre enhver bjælke i hele bygningen som vil foresage den slags kollaps

og så det os lidt skummelt at der er fundet så meget smeltet jern i kælderen som mere eller mindre kun kan stamme fra thermite eller sprængstoffer,, der er rimelig langt fra 600+ til 1500+

Du er godt nok helt ufattelig klog af en gut der i et andet topic erklærede, at skraldemand var for boglig en uddannelse for ham. Heldigt at bygningsingeniør på ikke har den slags krav, så det ingen sag var at sætte sig ind i for dig.

stregen der går gennem tårnet er der hvor flyet ramte da jern stolperne er blevet bløde har det fået hele bygning til at styrte sammen da vægten oven fra var alt for stor.

udover det... har set utallige vidne forklaringer og alle siger at det ligner militær fly

kig filmene på youtube, de fly der blev stjålet er alle sammen Boeing 767 hvis du slår det op på google kan du se det er et stort passager fly
og mange af dem i flyende ringede til deres pårørende fra flyet inden de styrtede i døden
det er ikke militær fly

er du dum eller hvad ? det er jo ik noget jeg selv sidder og regner ud, det er eksperter og normal fysisk lov der snakker her

flyet rammer etage 90 og der opstår brand... 90 etager nede i kælderen går der bomber af som kaster folk rundt og smadre vinduer og inventar, der er fundet tons af smeltet stål i kælderen, og det skulle være fra en brand på 600 grader 90 etager oppe ? det kræver ik nogen professor for at se det ik kan passe

og jeg vil gerne høre hvad i så har at sige til at de fly som skulle være inde i tårnene og pentagon flyver rundt andre steder ?? de terrorrister som angiveligt skulle have fløjet flyene er i live i andre steder af verden og har fået stjålet deres identitet ?

Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this "texting" system. ACARS was developed in 1978 and is still used today. Similar to cell phone networks, the ACARS network has remote ground stations installed around the world to route messages from ATC, the airline, etc, to the aircraft depending on it's location and vice versa. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier? Pilots For 9/11 Truth have briefly touched on this subject in 9/11: Intercepted through the excellent research of "Woody Box", who initially discovered such alarming information in the released FOIA documents(1). We now have further information which confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred

teknisk fejl ?

We stand with the numerous other growing organizations of Firefighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Military Officers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, along side Survivors, family members of the victims -- family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice -- including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11. We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or "hypothesis" as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make -- some more than others.

tror i det her er for sjov ? det er ikke en flok konspirations tosser og de baserer kun deres ting på hårde facts og ikke teorier, prøv at søg på 9/11 truth i google... så vil i se mindst 30 sider med eksperter i forskellige fag som forlanger sandheden

This post was edited by lulzz on Feb 26 2012 02:09pm

Nårh, du kunne da bare have sagt, at du havde så troværdige kilder! Jeg stoler også 100 % på bolded statements fra et eller andet unavngivet sted, og med argumenter som "er du dum eller hvad?" og "kig på google" må den almene befolkning da stå i kø for at høre dine visdomsord!

Mine 13 fg siger, at dine citater kommer fra en eller anden rabiat konspirationsteoriside, hvor gutterne bag aldrig har set skyggen af andet end indersiden af deres egen røv.

e: om jeg tror det er for sjov? Jeg håber egentlig mest, at du joker, for det er lidt pinligt det her.

This post was edited by Grandebedte on Feb 26 2012 02:15pm

prøver lige igen... du er åbenbart dummere end lort

Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this "texting" system. ACARS was developed in 1978 and is still used today. Similar to cell phone networks, the ACARS network has remote ground stations installed around the world to route messages from ATC, the airline, etc, to the aircraft depending on it's location and vice versa. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier? Pilots For 9/11 Truth have briefly touched on this subject in 9/11: Intercepted through the excellent research of "Woody Box", who initially discovered such alarming information in the released FOIA documents(1). We now have further information which confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred

We stand with the numerous other growing organizations of Firefighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Military Officers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, along side Survivors, family members of the victims -- family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice -- including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11. We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or "hypothesis" as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make -- some more than others.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

det er piloter, prøv at checke deres side og deres beviser inden du lukker lort ud

hvis du nu læste lidt om 9/11
9/11 fandt sted næsten lige da George W Bush kom til magten.
George W bush's Far som også var præsident, vandt Golf krigen som var først af Saddam Hussein
Saddam hussein har set sig sur på hele Bush familien og man ved at Saddam Hussein har hjulpet terror grupper som Al-Qaeda før
hvorfor skulle man lave sådan noget imod sit eget folk ??