I agree in the sense that the deformation of character (or attempted DoC) was unnecessary and unwarranted, but it is common to see people act in accordance with their inability to think and act rationally when upset or bothered.
In this tongue-in-asshole world of Ladder Slasher where the Market Place is used to "balance" the game, and the Trade Hall is used merely to cause inflation, I don't care for the bullshit scenario where ANYONE can buy ANYTHING "fair and square." How many times since this game was made public have two people agreed to a trade in the Trade Hall, only for the item to end up in the hands of someone else when it is taken to the Market Place? Where is the justification of that in the Rulebook? What is Paul's stance on that? I don't think he's ever come forth and explained his feelings on that frequently-occuring issue.
If he has noticed it, then there would be the decisive feeling (I assume) that one of the two is not needed. Since the MP is already integrated into the game, I think it would be easier to remove the Trade Hall. I'll stay tuned to see if it ever gets removed. (Ha

)
Jay was in the former Desolate Carnage. Say what you want about the board conduct of past and current members, but as someone who played Ladder Slasher while being in DC, I expected him to see the importance and significace of simply giving the item back to who it belonged to. The Ladder Slasher team of Desolate Carnage was built on teamwork and cooperation. I guess you could say I would expect any "Good Guy," past or present, to give it back. This isn't meant to pressure him or anyone, or to demand they act in line with my thought process. It is just to say I am surprised...and disappointed.