Hello d2jsp community,
hope you are having good time.


Today I noticed user Replay,http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=315453
He got accused for scamming by Butterzz, who provided valid evidences to back up his case.
While moderators proceeded with investigation he managed to scam another in meantime, specifically user Peckoslav.

What I am saying - as soon as someone accuse someone for scamming immediately put visible sign that that person is in investigation process.
It don`t have to be visible on his profile but it have to be visible any time he make thread, pm, post reply etc....
It would make easier to avoid problems like this where person accused with valid evidences manage to scam few others in meantime.



Best regards

This would promote false accusations.
This will not happen, sorry.

People will be locked once enough evidence has been provided.

Take a look at this link the next time you got a site suggestion:
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=57896631&f=258

This post was edited by FantaExotic on Sep 8 2012 04:25am

No

Is a good idea - something should be on the left near the avatar, maybe just a small exclamation mark next to the online/offline icon.

Mods being slow to review evidence, add that to mediaters too busy to mediate trades in a reasonable time frame - and let us not pretend they are reasonable, average medi speed for D2 for instance is what, 40 mins or longer? not good enough - and that leaves other users open to being scammed with no clue the trader has already had substantial evidence against them. Cannot expect every user to be as internet-savvy to check Scammer Forums before trading first.

The user didn't got locked in between time whem "Mods" were reviewing, if he didn't got locked before its because there wasnt enough proof to lock him.
This is not getting added for 2 x simple reasons.
First as soon as there is enough proof the user gets locked ( there is no such things as people scamming while we review, if there is enough the user will get locked before he even think about scamming someone else )
Second this clearly would promote false accusations



Not mean to be rude but you are talking about things you don't know. The reviewing process is far from being slow. If the guy is not locked its because there is not enough proof yet.