Quote (PRY @ Jun 18 2012 01:21pm)
A movement shouldn't be decided upon one personal instance. I think it's effective how it is.
It has happened many times -- as well as nothing happening to "unperm as perm" sellers.
Quote (Hylia @ Jun 18 2012 01:23pm)
your suggestions = 2000000000x more false accusations.
[x] No.
read above
Quote (FantaExotic @ Jun 18 2012 01:26pm)
An attempt to scam is not a scam.
The scammer accusations forum is perfect as it is.
This will not be implemented.
So what you're saying is it's merely frowned upon if you attemp and don't succeed with going through? It's the same exact thing as if he would have been able to do it.
Quote (Justine @ Jun 18 2012 01:30pm)
the scammer accusation is about facts, not assumptions.
your topic indicates that either your accused is a liar, or the user in the history is liar. who is, we dont know.
a liar is not automatically a scammer.
and the accused lying, doesnt make the item unperm. it might be, it might be not, he might just not have a good history, we dont know.
everything is just based on assumptions.
The item poofing is what makes it unperm. The scammer accusation topic is closed, therefor I cannot add more proof (he admitted to it being unperm when I told him it poofed)