d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > New Scammer Accusation System.
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 17,850
Joined: Jul 29 2009
Gold: 245.00
Jun 18 2012 11:18am
I am proposing that D2jsp needs a new or improved scammer accusation system. I just reported someone for attempting to sell unperms as perm, and as you can see in the thread -- it is plenty enough proof that he was attempting to.


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=63293217&f=250



Nothing will happen to him at all? I always take every precaution when I trade (verify history with previous owners, check their item versus old screenshots of the item), if I was just some ordinary person who does not do this -- I would have gotten scammed. Is that what JSP wants? Someone to lose hundreds of dollars worth of items before they take action?

There should be either a new tag added, or figure something to do when stuff like this happens. Possibly make a "probation tag" which would aware other members and staff of jsp of this user.

Member
Posts: 9,918
Joined: Mar 23 2008
Gold: 10.00
Jun 18 2012 11:21am
A movement shouldn't be decided upon one personal instance. I think it's effective how it is.
Member
Posts: 13,294
Joined: Jul 30 2011
Gold: 10.00
Jun 18 2012 11:23am
your suggestions = 2000000000x more false accusations.

[x] No.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 40,750
Joined: Sep 15 2009
Gold: 184,361.80
Trader: Trusted
Jun 18 2012 11:26am
An attempt to scam is not a scam.
The scammer accusations forum is perfect as it is.

This will not be implemented.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 26,229
Joined: Dec 22 2008
Gold: 66,667.14
Trader: Trusted
Jun 18 2012 11:30am
the scammer accusation is about facts, not assumptions.
your topic indicates that either your accused is a liar, or the user in the history is liar. who is, we dont know.
a liar is not automatically a scammer.
and the accused lying, doesnt make the item unperm. it might be, it might be not, he might just not have a good history, we dont know.
everything is just based on assumptions.

Member
Posts: 17,850
Joined: Jul 29 2009
Gold: 245.00
Jun 18 2012 11:34am
Quote (PRY @ Jun 18 2012 01:21pm)
A movement shouldn't be decided upon one personal instance. I think it's effective how it is.



It has happened many times -- as well as nothing happening to "unperm as perm" sellers.

Quote (Hylia @ Jun 18 2012 01:23pm)
your suggestions = 2000000000x more false accusations.

[x] No.


read above

Quote (FantaExotic @ Jun 18 2012 01:26pm)
An attempt to scam is not a scam.
The scammer accusations forum is perfect as it is.

This will not be implemented.


So what you're saying is it's merely frowned upon if you attemp and don't succeed with going through? It's the same exact thing as if he would have been able to do it.

Quote (Justine @ Jun 18 2012 01:30pm)
the scammer accusation is about facts, not assumptions.
your topic indicates that either your accused is a liar, or the user in the history is liar. who is, we dont know.
a liar is not automatically a scammer.
and the accused lying, doesnt make the item unperm. it might be, it might be not, he might just not have a good history, we dont know.
everything is just based on assumptions.


The item poofing is what makes it unperm. The scammer accusation topic is closed, therefor I cannot add more proof (he admitted to it being unperm when I told him it poofed)

Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll