its just not fair to have imo.
especially when warns come on such stupid things sometimes.
if it says 30 days.. it should be 30 days. not 45+ by the time you reject me twice. (i havent gotten a removal yet without at least 2+ rejects)
and my warns on so pathetic its hypocracy at its best.

and only the mediator who issued the warn should be able to extend it, if its gotta be that way...

this isnt about me. this is about everyone who gets unjustly rejected..

i could go on for days about just how bad an idea it is.

yo, its ur fault for doing what u not suppose to do to get the warn in the first place
e/ they can do what they want, its the rules
follow them and u wont have warn

This post was edited by TANN3R on Jun 1 2012 12:52pm

Seems legit

Sorry, but this is a no from me. My warn removal was rejected once, and I was upset for about 15 minutes then I got over it and quit posting things that would get it rejected again. EZ

youre one of those guys who would let the government bulldoze your home and not ask questions...

lol like i said before
How are u comparing the government to jsp lol
totally different aspects dude lol

another kid the government will control...

It appears as though you have a problem with the staff, not the policy itself.
It seems perfectly reasonable to me for mods to be able to reject warn removals in the case of users who show no signs of changing their behavior.

The problem, of course, is that warns and rejections have a tendency to be given for ridiculously stupid reasons.

I think Njaguar would like people to continue using his website,I know a bunch of people that don't use this site anymore or use it alot less just because of the injustices within.
Things need to be changed.

i see what your doing. and i dont like it.

i have a problem with the policy.