d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Uap List In S/a
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 52,341
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 10,935.00
Mar 15 2012 01:24pm
So, my suggestion is to make a list of Unperm as perm sellers, WITH VALID PROOF LIKE THE TECNICS CASE THAT IS UP, and yet they still didn't get locked.


It helps with them coming other realms on diablo 2 and selling unperms quickly on another realm to stack fg and be gone.





" Use a mediator"

Ok, well explain how that would help with someone who private dupes and doesn't poof the first ten times you leave.

" This would make for false accusations"

Yeah, so don't post every name that some randtard posts without any VALID proof.


I've seen plenty of people who have sold unperm as perm on east and still lived to do it again.

Anyone who says otherwise is rather stupid.





Diablo 2 is a huge community on this site. I don't see why this would be a bad idea, seeing as UaP is a HUGE problem.



Member
Posts: 44,271
Joined: Oct 4 2008
Gold: 297,855.65
Trader: Trusted
Mar 15 2012 01:28pm
Everyone is equal till they recive their Scammer tag. Unperm as Perm sellers should be reported in the s/a section, but "we" are not allowed to tag them becouse a thing that they might didn't do.
Member
Posts: 59,984
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 7,863.56
Mar 15 2012 01:29pm
Re-posting a closed suggestion is not a recommended course of action.

As stated, such a list would create massive unfounded accusations just for spite and would ruin many a good reputation.

Member
Posts: 52,083
Joined: Jan 4 2008
Gold: 6,940.00
Mar 15 2012 01:29pm
As mentioned before, we don't need this
The S/A is fine, unperm as perm sellers are scammers too so if it's proven they'll get what they deserve
Please stop spamming
Member
Posts: 52,341
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 10,935.00
Mar 15 2012 01:29pm
Quote (Paparick @ Mar 15 2012 02:29pm)
Re-posting a closed suggestion is not a recommended course of action.

As stated, such a list would create massive unfounded accusations just for spite and would ruin many a good reputation.


Like I said with proof.

This a completely different suggestion from the first.

Thank you, Sir.


Quote (Madrid @ Mar 15 2012 02:29pm)
As mentioned before, we don't need this
The S/A is fine, unperm as perm sellers are scammers too so if it's proven they'll get what they deserve
Please stop spamming



Rofl right.

This post was edited by Pious on Mar 15 2012 01:30pm
Member
Posts: 39,186
Joined: Dec 15 2004
Gold: 29,455.19
Mar 15 2012 01:30pm
yes for sure
Member
Posts: 13,981
Joined: Dec 9 2007
Gold: 1,735.00
Trader: Trusted
Mar 15 2012 01:35pm
No.

This would only cause mass false accusations in order to ruin a persons reputation.
If there's enough evidence to prove that a user has scammed, he or she will get locked.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 15,410
Joined: Jun 2 2005
Gold: 9,504.66
Trader: Trusted
Mar 15 2012 02:45pm
No this has already been rejected. Do not re-post this suggestion. Thank you.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll