Quote (Failstrom @ Jun 15 2011 07:17pm)
personally, i think that it could be a valid idea for those who have fg and just make the penalty equal to the percent of the warn...if i read/understood rules correctly, a 100% warn=account deletion anyway so at 10% warn, take 10% of their fg, rounded to nearest whole number.
bad idea
imagine someone with 100k fg gets a warn for something small
10k fg gone?
now compare to some random person who spams and loses only 2fg
is that fair?
edit: overall I'm going to have to say no however. I do believe warns should be given out more frequently however. It is what it is a WARNING. No need for verbal warnings in my opinion.
This post was edited by matrixdudej on Jun 15 2011 05:24pm