d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Fines For Spamming, Other Violations
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 8,590
Joined: Apr 1 2011
Gold: Locked
Jun 15 2011 04:46pm
Currently forum violations are responded to with verbal warnings and when excessive with an official warn.

I propose add a "fine" with the 10% warn. I am not saying fine every violation or fine during verbal warnings.

Only when a user receives a % warn, they should also be fined (maybe fines increase as warns increase?)

Member
Posts: 1,494
Joined: Jun 28 2003
Gold: 690.27
Jun 15 2011 04:47pm
Worst idea ever. Not everyone has fg.
Member
Posts: 3,886
Joined: Mar 26 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 15 2011 04:51pm
sure. gimme fg and ill be down with that
Member
Posts: 8,719
Joined: May 27 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 15 2011 04:52pm
I like it in the case by case basis.
Member
Posts: 8,198
Joined: Dec 28 2006
Gold: 131.86
Trader: Trusted
Jun 15 2011 04:53pm
In general, the people that excessively flame and break rules on a common bases normally don't have forum gold. In my opinion, the current warn system is sufficient enough.

Going to have to be a "No" from me.
Member
Posts: 20,261
Joined: Dec 31 2008
Gold: 67.15
Jun 15 2011 04:53pm
Quote (Brimz @ 15 Jun 2011 18:47)
Not everyone has fg.


Agree with this
But I've seen people with negative FG
Like they stole it and spent some somewhere so when an admin took it from them, they also took more than they had
Could be like that if you have no FG, it'll just go negative and while you're making more, whatever you didn't pay (negative amount), goes to the forum bank or w/e

Maybe in some cases

This post was edited by 1nt0_3t3rn1ty on Jun 15 2011 05:00pm
Member
Posts: 21,249
Joined: Mar 26 2007
Gold: 0.06
Trader: Trusted
Jun 15 2011 05:06pm
I don't think this is going to happen. :mellow:
Member
Posts: 602
Joined: Jun 1 2011
Gold: 105.00
Jun 15 2011 05:17pm
personally, i think that it could be a valid idea for those who have fg and just make the penalty equal to the percent of the warn...if i read/understood rules correctly, a 100% warn=account deletion anyway so at 10% warn, take 10% of their fg, rounded to nearest whole number.
Member
Posts: 3,006
Joined: Aug 17 2006
Gold: 5,961.00
Jun 15 2011 05:23pm
Quote (Failstrom @ Jun 15 2011 07:17pm)
personally, i think that it could be a valid idea for those who have fg and just make the penalty equal to the percent of the warn...if i read/understood rules correctly, a 100% warn=account deletion anyway so at 10% warn, take 10% of their fg, rounded to nearest whole number.


bad idea
imagine someone with 100k fg gets a warn for something small
10k fg gone?
now compare to some random person who spams and loses only 2fg
is that fair?

edit: overall I'm going to have to say no however. I do believe warns should be given out more frequently however. It is what it is a WARNING. No need for verbal warnings in my opinion.

This post was edited by matrixdudej on Jun 15 2011 05:24pm
Member
Posts: 8,590
Joined: Apr 1 2011
Gold: Locked
Jun 15 2011 06:37pm
What about giving negative fg to those who have none? that way they will have to earn even more to buy anything...

and fines should be flat fee, it doesn't make sense to stagger them based on how much fg the use has.

and if you are in the negative fg maybe X day suspension?

This post was edited by Mens on Jun 15 2011 06:40pm
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll