Currently, warn removal dates are based on how many times you've been warned in the past.

Default time for warn removal is 30 days, however, you get a longer wait period, based on how many warns you have.
Someone with 50% warn, will wait longer than someone with 10%.
The problem however is, it does not roll back, even once you remove all your warns, you still have the penalty applied as if you had those warns.

My suggestion is to have these penalties nulled once you have gone so long without getting any warns.

Example: A member that was at one point "bad" [Many warns] goes good, and goes for Year+ warnless. Yet in the event of a new warn, he still has to wait an extensive amount of time
as if he had all those warns from the past.

The idea is to have a breakpoint, where penalties from old warns, will wear off.

Post Thoughts/comments/votes


(Credits to Dijinni For re-wording the idea for me)

This post was edited by Coca_Cola on Nov 4 2010 01:11pm

voted no. Warns are implemented because you didn't follow The Rules

"Your account is your responsibility and it is your responsibility to know and follow all site rules."

Also, it makes sense waiting longer for more warns. If you just made a mistake, a rude outburst on a bad day, you wait 30 days, you get it removed. and go along as before, acting appropriately.

but if your constantly going about causing trouble and keep getting caught, maybe you should re-read the rules, or find a new forum.

And before its voiced: Yes i know I'm preaching to a bunch of high school kids who don't give a crap and just want their way.

Agree 100%

Let's say you were warned and your wait time for removal is 60 days. You waited 59 days for it to be removed, then you were warned for something silly. Then you gotta wait 60 days + another 60 days or more to remove both! Makes no sense.