Okay so yeah, i've bin thinking that if you type like : "LOOOL GTFO FCKER !!!! HAHAH LOOOOOOOOOOOL", or post some random picture or something. in a topic you should get 0.10 warn and it will get auto deleted after 24 hours. ( no ban or anything )
i think this would help alot for all the spam around @ jsp

Best regards Nadia

exsample :

This post was edited by Noodle on Sep 6 2010 04:48pm

where can i vote for LOOOL GTFO FCKER !!!! HAHAH LOOOOOOOOOOOL

xD

This post was edited by nobody367 on Sep 6 2010 05:08pm

So what you're saying is an ability for a more "minor" warn instead of 10%. So that anything that breaks a rule but is minor can still be enforced with a warn, but not a full 10%.

Is this correct?

Dont really like this idea, just stick to the rules and you wont ever get warned.
However i do agree that +10% warns should be handed out more frequently!

I would agree with this, and then if you have 2 or more minor infractions in the same day they should get the 24hr +10%

yep.

exsample :


0.10 warn for you.



and when he reaces 10 he will get banned for 24 hours - tho the 10 % warn thingy should still be there. but for small things like this guy they should get 0.10. or even 0.05 or something. just to get jsp more cleaner



there is SOOO many people that spams inzanely much and dont get a warn so i thourd that you should get less than 10. its pretty hard to get 10 % warn. so every time you do something wrong 0.10 warn !.

This post was edited by Noodle on Sep 6 2010 05:16pm

you would have to hire a thousand and one more moderators to be able to make this system effective and fair.
I do agree that currently most people have no clue why they get 10% , some get it after a single swear , others swear 100's of posts and fly under the radar , so i would like to see a better way of handling it then there is now.
This would not be the solution.

No imo.

a warn is a warn. there shouldn't be "half warns" or fraction warns.

your right, but ive seen ALOT of topics getting closed without them getting a warn, and in such a case they should get the 0.10


big edit: 0.10 is way to little. i ment 1%. fail ! - or maybe? well its just an suggestion

This post was edited by Noodle on Sep 6 2010 05:20pm

.10% is rediculous statement , but a 3 strikes your out system seems fair.

Think of catagory's : Swearing+spamming , early bumping+early reposting , (only 2 catagory's i can think of)

If you would get 3 of these minor infractions in a 72hr time period , you'd get a 2 hour ban +10% first time , 24 hour ban 10% second time , and 7 day ban +20% 3rd time
So every time / every offence the 72hr period would starts again (if you get the 2nd minor infraction 65 hours after the first , the clock get's reset).

Just some food for tought