d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive > Star Upgrades > Lets
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 460Replies: 10Track Topic
Member
Posts: 41,011
Joined: Mar 18 2006
Gold: 11,500.00
#1
Aug 3 2010 12:25am
Make it so we really know how much someone donated.

I mean like 5x Orange star is one of the last "Star upgrades".


An[B]d if I was to see this, I would think oh he did not donate much.

Idk. You would really have to study the star upgrades to get a real accurate notification of how much someone donated.

I here have 3 Orange star, and it is one of the early stages of donating.

I think there should be at least a color codination of when upgrading, and not scatter it. ( Like it is now )

Sorry this is a pretty lame suggestion, and I can make hardley any sense when I type these days, but I would like star upgrades to be more "Pure".

Idfk..

Thanks ( Don't hate me :( )

I think more people would be donating to this site if the stars were a different order, to mainly show "whose boss"

Something like that yes.

This post was edited by GlowSticks on Aug 3 2010 12:31am
Member
Posts: 68,901
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 480.00
#2
Aug 3 2010 12:26am
i like this suggestion too :)
Member
Posts: 20,524
Joined: May 9 2007
Gold: 13.37
#3
Aug 3 2010 12:27am
Star upgrades' amounts are confidential, it won't ever be changed to show it to public :/

// and 'bout the order of stars?? they are not scattered, also it would be hard to set up imo.. Paul wont change it.

However, I'd like to see a small change too..

This post was edited by Tomek25 on Aug 3 2010 12:44am
Member
Posts: 89,702
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 165,885.69
#4
Aug 3 2010 12:27am
I believe that you are right. The stacking is weird. It should be each certain color (except the first one) gets its own seperate column.

Quote (Tomek25 @ Aug 2 2010 11:27pm)
Star upgrades' amounts are confidential, it won't ever be changed to show it to public :/


Apparently, you read very well.

~ Edit #2

Like first columm = stacking of the first star.

2nd column = stacking of the second star.

etc etc

This post was edited by Springer on Aug 3 2010 12:41am
Member
Posts: 68,901
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 480.00
#5
Aug 3 2010 12:31am
Quote (Springer @ Aug 3 2010 01:27am)
I believe that you are right. The stacking is weird. It should be each certain color (except the first one) gets its own seperate column.



Apparently, you read very well.


the stars scattered around dont show anything besides un orginization

This post was edited by WhozyerDaddy on Aug 3 2010 12:38am
Member
Posts: 22,693
Joined: Jul 18 2006
Gold: 68,071.02
Trader: Trusted
#6
Aug 3 2010 12:31am
no, it's fine like it is.

if the stars would get re-ordered, a lot of people would complain about losing their archieved star.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 41,884
Joined: May 31 2006
Gold: 1,409.95
Trader: Trusted
#7
Aug 3 2010 12:32am
Quote (WhozyerDaddy @ 3 Aug 2010 00:31)
just shows where mods are focused on... only about the $$ the site brings in, not the orginization of the star colors instead of scattering em around


Wrong, horrible ideal theory.

Second, It was suggested before to be able to re-arrange your stars around with other colors.
Not sure if it was shut down or just left behind in the posts, I think it'd be cool, but depends on
how easy it would be to set it up.
Member
Posts: 41,011
Joined: Mar 18 2006
Gold: 11,500.00
#8
Aug 3 2010 12:33am
Quote (Sane @ Aug 2 2010 11:31pm)
no, it's fine like it is.

if the stars would get re-ordered, a lot of people would complain about losing their archieved star.
Negative, because if it was to change they would have a good marking on where they are on donating, and prove more.

...

Really I was considering donating 126k FG for a .. "1x Black Star"?

Whose going to honestly recognize that as being a "BIG" Donator?

I do however understand getting into Purple/Light Blue/Brown.

But you achieve brown earlier. So WTF lol



All I'm saying as it should be at least be color coordinated not having brown then light blue then brown AGAIN?


Idk it pisses me off k.

Quote (Tomek25 @ Aug 2 2010 11:27pm)
Star upgrades' amounts are confidential, it won't ever be changed to show it to public :/

// and 'bout the order of stars?? :headscratch: maybe you're right :p (a bit) ;)


Well something must be done!
Ah...

This post was edited by GlowSticks on Aug 3 2010 12:43am
Member
Posts: 64,282
Joined: Jul 17 2009
Gold: 111,131.11
#9
Aug 3 2010 01:27am
I agree the "don't scatter the stars part", but not so that you mean that you unlock all the greys before any blues, all blues before reds and so on. I think you should unlock all the single ones, then all the double ones, then all the triple ones and so on instead. Then all 1 stars is in Tier 1, all 2 stars are in Tier 2... I think I would prefer that

About the knwoing how much someone donated? Never going to happen, and I don't see why people should know it anyway, it would only be an object of ridicule about how much someone was "a donordog lololol".
Member
Posts: 41,011
Joined: Mar 18 2006
Gold: 11,500.00
#10
Aug 3 2010 12:27pm
Quote (Razzattack @ Aug 3 2010 12:27am)
I agree the "don't scatter the stars part", but not so that you mean that you unlock all the greys before any blues, all blues before reds and so on. I think you should unlock all the single ones, then all the double ones, then all the triple ones and so on instead. Then all 1 stars is in Tier 1, all 2 stars are in Tier 2... I think I would prefer that

About the knwoing how much someone donated? Never going to happen, and I don't see why people should know it anyway, it would only be an object of ridicule about how much someone was "a donordog lololol".


Well at least a non scattered order would be nice.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact